[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted peony 2.0.1-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:15:38 +0800
Source: peony
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Kylin Team <team+kylin@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: handsome_feng <jianfengli@ubuntukylin.com>
Closes: 951607
Changes:
 peony (2.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * debian/control:
     - Add build-depends pkg-kde-tools.
   * debian/rule:
     - using pkgkde_symbolshelper.
   * debian/libpeony2.symbols.
     - Using pkg-kde-tools update the symbols file. (Closes: #951607)
Checksums-Sha1:
 666f416b90ba7ebd5349dee9592a7a786244b2ba 2254 peony_2.0.1-1.dsc
 67dd7d37bdbfbe56a7858d637f4be369400d7fad 297855 peony_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 93c610e2e7c724d1055611ca3d37814aaf951fc2 23236 peony_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 cffdc23fd13da9706251936a3c7a210b8eed6879 12111 peony_2.0.1-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b413002fdbac0503a86d0978836266fc84b10b2387f177442bf1a019df99cb50 2254 peony_2.0.1-1.dsc
 9de8a87c8307cd8ae40bb1572a9d9118769ae93e5c83083f5c41685e77546194 297855 peony_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 8c5adbd3b42be8a701f0a38aae1fe1ff071e697c07a0e38b147eb3b0af53f770 23236 peony_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 475e5e13829e38c119f75d85c1acebf55d9be3484921805ea0b16d5ba2bda704 12111 peony_2.0.1-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 d46212169fef8f30fd4f907354204997 2254 utils optional peony_2.0.1-1.dsc
 32a5bf5b9f9719847747caeb423120aa 297855 utils optional peony_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz
 b437403b797d5d710716be3f48ed5e3c 23236 utils optional peony_2.0.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 d8be58fc35613eccd40e65c244bc7872 12111 utils optional peony_2.0.1-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KD4O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: