Accepted juce 5.4.6~ds0-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:34:24 +0100
Source: juce
Architecture: source
Version: 5.4.6~ds0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org>
Closes: 944381
Changes:
juce (5.4.6~ds0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ IOhannes m zmölnig ]
* New upstream version 5.4.6~ds0
* Drop patches applied upstream
* Refresh patches
* Fixed mimetype in Projucer.desktop (Closes: #944381)
* Pass CPPFLAGS/CFLAGS/LDFLAGS when building lv2_ttl_generator
* Remove single-quotes from mimecap entry
* Added configuration for salsa-ci
* Bump dh-compat to 12
* Bump standards version to 4.5.0
.
[ Olivier Humbert ]
* Update copyright (http -> https)
* Update libjuce-doc.doc-base (remove 1 empty line)
* Update Projucer.desktop (add FR comment & GenericName)
* Update README.libjuce-doc (remove 1 empty line)
* Update copyright (add myself)
Checksums-Sha1:
4cdc1f5e36f00e5819f6b94398530505237a300f 2616 juce_5.4.6~ds0-1.dsc
53374334869131a7cc3c2980aad89be19e4b07eb 5409224 juce_5.4.6~ds0.orig.tar.xz
1fd193b739119223b0be7584c82c0766ab92dca6 60116 juce_5.4.6~ds0-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
795d3748dc1a2446b83fdfee40ef4b0c78fb4e30048fcac53a4eb363bf88ca7d 2616 juce_5.4.6~ds0-1.dsc
6784c0515697f21351a42d52b781f0e5d481bd5424014ae1eadc8d46deb74171 5409224 juce_5.4.6~ds0.orig.tar.xz
ac1adec2ebc25e1aa490e3261416bab3b5db45e512b6011e4b7ce153acdaebba 60116 juce_5.4.6~ds0-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
8d13da52e59526a19cea5ceda8ae8eaa 2616 devel optional juce_5.4.6~ds0-1.dsc
38b134a4e7605d6cee6ca083747e6016 5409224 devel optional juce_5.4.6~ds0.orig.tar.xz
408288af4a4751a7ddf5fff42d0c7108 60116 devel optional juce_5.4.6~ds0-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=7JkA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: