Accepted boxfort 0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 00:19:36 +0100
Source: boxfort
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: SZALAY Attila <sasa@debian.org>
Changed-By: SZALAY Attila <sasa@debian.org>
Changes:
boxfort (0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* [9b8a39f] Narrow down the architectures to where the might compile.
The upstream has a short list which is supported.
Removing all architectures which is explicitly unsupported creates less
noises on the build hosts. There are still architectures, which is
theoretically supported, but the tests fails. But I'm keeping that
architectures in the list now and I'm going to try fixing them.
Checksums-Sha1:
1dabffab027a19f00fdaaf06b0135c8e05b2d7d1 1946 boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3.dsc
78f9c08b0172d38ea8f515a9c64bce7611f2b8af 3168 boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3.debian.tar.xz
05e216713062eb84f9b60b2a6c0d11a928e5d8f0 6989 boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
e4a7a611c14737098e5e59b6eb305097a0fe74e9f4d91ff765a0732ea326c82b 1946 boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3.dsc
1c9727b21daeefd95a4e6d320e1de6c97d11e1e034f8e93c54b2c00a10d7c1f9 3168 boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3.debian.tar.xz
ab40e81762a3f96eb560004cef7b4a08eee0b6ced2c2a834b2c221e95af3f31f 6989 boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
0a931ed9a123d48c05ac615315bf95b4 1946 libs optional boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3.dsc
f346cf672c04842e95b7a71103c1c64d 3168 libs optional boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3.debian.tar.xz
01e5559053d9a24f531a3260fe8dbfa3 6989 libs optional boxfort_0.0.0-git20200105-3e16c0a-3_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=362Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: