[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted flexc++ 2.07.07-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:29:12 +0100
Source: flexc++
Architecture: source
Version: 2.07.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Frank B. Brokken <f.b.brokken@rug.nl>
Changed-By: Frank B. Brokken <f.b.brokken@rug.nl>
Changes:
 flexc++ (2.07.07-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release added missing implementation of the
     ScannerBase::streamStack member function
   * Updated debian/control (standards: 4.4.1, added debhelper-compat and
     Rules-Requires-Root specifications
   * Removed now superfluous debian/compat
Checksums-Sha1:
 026907222ac4ec014acc54881eabd25405a05dd1 2011 flexc++_2.07.07-1.dsc
 301c82d67f75bf70cd1bc52b8aeec8508741b394 4418669 flexc++_2.07.07.orig.tar.gz
 18ffffbf7dca3117bd05c194a9aaf0ab4a38105f 6696 flexc++_2.07.07-1.debian.tar.xz
 6a14a505e3a43d20add986d314454751226eb6e5 6400 flexc++_2.07.07-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 308fd28ed31fd22cf1af280269ae5c51ee74d3338ff5839bead8e6cfb26a7c47 2011 flexc++_2.07.07-1.dsc
 0e39ebc407b202546ac05764ff3c166374dd6a4da604bae5246ddf9d43a5df87 4418669 flexc++_2.07.07.orig.tar.gz
 bc8efd6eb883fbc4f7fc609bb52fb2c58621807e7635fb017e630914ecc7733f 6696 flexc++_2.07.07-1.debian.tar.xz
 b8c3aa0c2c7cb6a0fc9e935b1f5c4e0ed1ee06d948f10683faef608b57b80752 6400 flexc++_2.07.07-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 10605c833f0e0f69a7d9d1e572e38040 2011 devel optional flexc++_2.07.07-1.dsc
 c75dea5fc6e66108ee2a3f9ca6dd90fb 4418669 devel optional flexc++_2.07.07.orig.tar.gz
 acc421790102c241a0dc33c9c33ae75a 6696 devel optional flexc++_2.07.07-1.debian.tar.xz
 a362823647f5edec1faa4b3592bc0fcb 6400 devel optional flexc++_2.07.07-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WKOu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: