Accepted musescore-general-soundfont 0.1.7-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA384
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 22:22:19 +0200
Source: musescore-general-soundfont
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Changes:
musescore-general-soundfont (0.1.7-2) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Make musescore-general-soundfont-lossless Provides two new
virtual packages “sf2-soundfont-gm” and “sf3-soundfont-gm”
and register itself with priority 70 for the alternatives
/usr/share/sounds/sf2/default-GM.sf2 and …/sf3/default-GM.sf3
for the new “default soundfont” scheme discussed in #929185
• Do the same, with priority 60 and SF3 only, in the package
musescore-general-soundfont
* Point out SND support in package description
* Bump Policy (with no relevant changes)
* Let m-g-s-lossless Provides m-g-s (as m-g-s-small does)
Checksums-Sha1:
cf441881b58643a2aab969bb689318f764bd87c0 2298 musescore-general-soundfont_0.1.7-2.dsc
379fce21a270fbca992d668be6717cd72b8069b5 9492 musescore-general-soundfont_0.1.7-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
9dd6c38d69d5ffa8310e5522f2cde0ac858140ef0837f9b3d4a02c34b0807e39 2298 musescore-general-soundfont_0.1.7-2.dsc
3254d625decac0169277047d6f39654fdc5e54a67488695c9846408aa310f6fb 9492 musescore-general-soundfont_0.1.7-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
c4c5707af8e5d65e810df3f8598b5835 2298 sound optional musescore-general-soundfont_0.1.7-2.dsc
e7d4be9b38797e04bf023991ade55414 9492 sound optional musescore-general-soundfont_0.1.7-2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (MirBSD)
Comment: ☃ ЦΤℱ—８ ☕☂☄
iQIcBAEBCQAGBQJdRJ7VAAoJEHa1NLLpkAfgtaEQAJH/CK8/YGGv6iHWkI8YI/Le
1YWOqNqALoAoxCDMDnYLG8pF2hm4km7ncs3T7zSbfiBqtIgMTbKCcV48G+1gfmF6
L/xX1MwH1eQtMgF7l3G/RmPdIQFEA8xxiUgDIAi5K136cZ33wLW0HocUO7nI8U72
yDvbFx9M7D0aeDW0NF4zm4tgtGgYCczNzQydkpNCUI4grtk+ZjOr7ZaEAHkZ6EzP
pk2ElVaNPrW7Jnmo1cMhDxgBEp68yvZdVDAXt3ysq/ptSPIA3lg1CxzljRzWK+4B
yrp0HLs2451Sr0pZIzh9sP5nz8m93jz4eRUvxy69aqMdv8amXGRc2VXo4RKcP/gE
AvGSoUqGkkO7sqvUxc/q2zYqmEZ2L70DMMwt8ag2LImB8GnYEwmCSo6hhPn+vF7U
h9h/mJv1woDjd6dycGd2oqIWHZgmgj73F28HlqW+NAYzWznNBu5GBnPf2oBYV361
tleAMewKwjLxU+3ioN+RXiLzqzrrVXDzuR3TidQaHc5DH6CbXVxFTfjbP2Pn2QVm
Q8z5pCXGfZ105Eoknp1gHB0zHdrem9BJr+JEEil4ezkVvhSxHnQ4O5xGBG+4xVxy
ycH8k6RFYd5i6IKnbTtyhwIthIbl1bXiomq1lWU6Jj/UU6XRBHJaewR5veDZPsHB
X5MNBMbIQNQ0oFtLj034
=nrHW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: