Accepted systemtap 4.2-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 23:23:30 +0100
Source: systemtap
Architecture: source
Version: 4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@debian.org>
Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca <ema@debian.org>
Changes:
systemtap (4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* Drop the following patches shipped in 4.2:
- da2a89d syscalls.xmlpart-tbody.patch
- 79d0c97 check_task_work_cancel_exportedness.patch
- 910acbe vsprintf-fallthru.patch
Checksums-Sha1:
598ef5c8f787cbd0f69164d5b6665aade71c89ff 3034 systemtap_4.2-1.dsc
efdb0d6e09ebdfa2acbfdb725542885db2195bb6 5443557 systemtap_4.2.orig.tar.gz
f4f91adc4830b3b988d7e226540c6d652ccd91d5 488 systemtap_4.2.orig.tar.gz.asc
632c2103707e5e4fc694c68f7d594ac3d1fe5514 28620 systemtap_4.2-1.debian.tar.xz
d647f2b34dafa0be25ac90d66cd35afe1ef1d0c5 12024 systemtap_4.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
a4d64b0f1f21a6ab873293434136b674f1dc9e6fb4601bf703eec207156132a7 3034 systemtap_4.2-1.dsc
0984ebe3162274988252ec35074021dc1e8420d87a8b35f437578562fce08781 5443557 systemtap_4.2.orig.tar.gz
e07ab87442433f81c6785646a1747f559e34379fa2530187eae5ccda47492fbe 488 systemtap_4.2.orig.tar.gz.asc
c38c71398d9cd318f0c8d161b4c6283d70c689cdc62c4a758a5de1fbe18d3bce 28620 systemtap_4.2-1.debian.tar.xz
96f92af85f727169591534ad74b47bb4ccdfaeeab9718d07c66f3f43e2966d24 12024 systemtap_4.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
30756c1a8715c9d0a969fd948fc7b358 3034 devel optional systemtap_4.2-1.dsc
23e8e64d3e4a6e75a29c57fac98b68d8 5443557 devel optional systemtap_4.2.orig.tar.gz
76670578c4749bc37dc275f037e3b2b6 488 devel optional systemtap_4.2.orig.tar.gz.asc
eb778ed801289a4c91b45deda8450e21 28620 devel optional systemtap_4.2-1.debian.tar.xz
04413c2d9eedd0794a0857a14b4439c0 12024 devel optional systemtap_4.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=pg+j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: