Accepted jacktrip 1.1~repack-6 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:19:01 +0200
Source: jacktrip
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1~repack-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org>
Closes: 923566
Changes:
jacktrip (1.1~repack-6) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Ondřej Nový ]
* d/copyright: Use https protocol in Format field
* d/control: Set Vcs-* to salsa.debian.org
.
[ Felipe Sateler ]
* Change maintainer address to debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org
.
[ IOhannes m zmölnig ]
* Improve cross building: Use a triplet-prefixed pkg-config.
Thanks to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> (Closes: #923566)
* Switch build-system from CDBS to dh
* Add fix for another spelling error
* Update d/copyright
* Add Files-Excluded stanza
* Update dates
* Regenerate d/copyright_hints
* Fix typo in d/README.source
* Declare that building the package doesn't require 'root' powers
* Drop obsolete d/source/local-options to allow 'dgit push'
* Removed Jonas from uploaders (after a quick check on IRC)
* Bump dh compat to 12
* Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat
* Bump standards-version to 4.4.0
Checksums-Sha1:
38b4adade777dc0363e4e0776b76053e5aa91e24 2238 jacktrip_1.1~repack-6.dsc
2fecfd69ffb3f6443ca0f3cde8f07f846ab23c32 8296 jacktrip_1.1~repack-6.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
23393ce09f0d00d5ce67f0339cada423cf4f9b9e8c8bfbad1383af2f2fb0bd22 2238 jacktrip_1.1~repack-6.dsc
792b8527e9897a60ce53ef2cb8a083a4434e6b1cd0d5dfd3b1c584964b38ba71 8296 jacktrip_1.1~repack-6.debian.tar.xz
Files:
d673c37f73a95ae1eff1aeb5bc4d87cf 2238 sound optional jacktrip_1.1~repack-6.dsc
274c1884442d00f5ebf90dce1b376551 8296 sound optional jacktrip_1.1~repack-6.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=RA6x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: