[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gem2deb 0.44 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 10:19:43 -0300
Source: gem2deb
Architecture: source
Version: 0.44
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Changes:
 gem2deb (0.44) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Georg Faerber ]
   * bin/gem2deb-test-runner: fix typo
 .
   [ Cédric Boutillier ]
   * Update templates for new packages
     - Set debhelper compat level to 12
     - Add salsa-ci config file
     - Set Standards-Version to 4.4.0 in template
 .
   [ Utkarsh Gupta ]
   * Add salsa-ci.yml
   * Add d/upstream/metadata in template
   * Bump lib/gem2deb/version.rb
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.4.0 & debhelper-compat to 12
   * Remove compat from test
 .
   [ Antonio Terceiro ]
   * dh-make-ruby: add `DH_RUBY = --gem-install` by default to debian/rules
Checksums-Sha1:
 3ce7ecd1e38fd9f554c3f9afce4cda99bf1235f5 2258 gem2deb_0.44.dsc
 2570f3497fea0525d27b40ff340b08fa1bcc55bc 68864 gem2deb_0.44.tar.xz
 278e4dc25755a62a4d20bff2665f3c5318f0d4ca 14317 gem2deb_0.44_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 e5b4cd054479759465ff7870075aadc36614f47bf89408691e7ba5fcf24b50c3 2258 gem2deb_0.44.dsc
 dd3e3ee4f246337ee3451d304e8b8cb139c45df11caa1e0901a9c1f212616c77 68864 gem2deb_0.44.tar.xz
 3be12975c1fb5de36ba3a75c3887bdf234c68c4018f88ddd90fe1a7420f9d2f6 14317 gem2deb_0.44_source.buildinfo
Files:
 17303ab294d08ae9f9506b015bf1f8f7 2258 ruby optional gem2deb_0.44.dsc
 f9f8e2186871f27b4853148ee945a0da 68864 ruby optional gem2deb_0.44.tar.xz
 2a12bfd53c3dee92c446d1d5db27ce62 14317 ruby optional gem2deb_0.44_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0Zrc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: