Accepted xdu 3.0-20 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:28:55 +0200
Source: xdu
Architecture: source
Version: 3.0-20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Rémi Vanicat <vanicat@debian.org>
Changed-By: Rémi Vanicat <vanicat@debian.org>
Closes: 922875 935355
Changes:
xdu (3.0-20) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Bug fix: "synthesized nodes are absurdly large", thanks to Norman
Rasmussen (Closes: #935355).
* Patch from Norman Rasmussen to fix: "miscounts the size of root
directory", thanks to Tanaka Akira (Closes: #922875).
* Change Vcs field for salsa.
* Bumped standards version to 4.4.0 (no changes)
Checksums-Sha1:
0a0a73d147ee03346e33879220c101e36079e2a3 1891 xdu_3.0-20.dsc
92ebd64c44f1e0ff47e41127fd770a7001eec3da 8036 xdu_3.0-20.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
e476470a72cb21b1a787f2a9aafed30fb0de6321cba610b3e53320ac7091a992 1891 xdu_3.0-20.dsc
0a72c9ebeaaf52fd2c1c395b243d047c3dee465c21dc3093c51f88c238768a1b 8036 xdu_3.0-20.debian.tar.xz
Files:
99b60c05ba4e2cd101f4efa2c8b55808 1891 utils optional xdu_3.0-20.dsc
6a294bc8375a6b13ba04f6e934c891a5 8036 utils optional xdu_3.0-20.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=wnNV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: