Accepted lwip 2.1.2-3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 19:25:35 +0200
Source: lwip
Binary: liblwip-dev liblwip-doc liblwip0 liblwip0-dbgsym
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Changed-By: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>
Description:
liblwip-dev - small implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite - development f
liblwip-doc - small implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite - documentation
liblwip0 - small implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite - shared librar
Changes:
lwip (2.1.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Joan Lledó ]
* debian/patches/patch9350:
* Remove _HAVE_SA_LEN macros
* Some macros related to sa_len field were written to this
file by mistake
* debian/patches/port:
* Fix bug on thrad handling
* In the Hurd, pthread_cond_timedwait() returns EINTR when
the thread has been cancelled
* Move some #includes in cc.h from max_sockets to port:
* <sys/ioctl.h>
* <fcntl.h>
* <net/if.h>
* <sys/types.h>
* Fix build error on some architectures
* sio module: memset struct sigaction to 0
* Use memset to set all struct sigaction fields to 0
instead of doing it field by field, since fields depend
on the architecture
* debian/patches/max_sockets:
* Remove #includes in cc.h moved to port patch
Checksums-Sha1:
07b71aa11dc4030a1715844172437d63035f54b9 1935 lwip_2.1.2-3.dsc
ffc13116ea20f1cc5553963ec20f18bc68c4121e 28892 lwip_2.1.2-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
6d7fcd07c8180c48813ae8b0b2d449f7ff222a5c10f5b4cafcfe6bd57b853f79 1935 lwip_2.1.2-3.dsc
c0ac4ccb0556e0bcf6965aad2e1414841987a2dc8dc529d7cc45bbd8b2205a07 28892 lwip_2.1.2-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
4b25bec087fdd3be6b415c3e37794988 1935 libs optional lwip_2.1.2-3.dsc
5fcd0d76aba327cfa6b43459615456d6 28892 libs optional lwip_2.1.2-3.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=d1ZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: