Accepted libdfp 1.0.14-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:42:18 +0200
Source: libdfp
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.14-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Frédéric Bonnard <frediz@debian.org>
Changed-By: Frédéric Bonnard <frediz@debian.org>
Changes:
libdfp (1.0.14-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
* Remove patch on test/test-amort.c
* Remove patch 0002-Adapt-the-code-for-glibc-2.28.patch
* Remove patch 0003-Return-the-number-of-chars-output-in-printf.patch
* Rename 0004-Use-python3.patch
* Switch to debhelper-compat usage
* Bump Standards-Version
* Ignore tests known to fail on soft-dfp and POWER hard-dfp
Checksums-Sha1:
813ecc953e953037da000fa4a6777d200c45a282 2061 libdfp_1.0.14-1.dsc
e5964ce6de71281dd00f5d3a48d10d8fbea5dc91 819588 libdfp_1.0.14.orig.tar.gz
273a1765723e90fc6e15b4f21ae1b5e9fbb8019a 7424 libdfp_1.0.14-1.debian.tar.xz
12c24d9011dae708e366093e02618ba1edf8e5ad 6295 libdfp_1.0.14-1_ppc64el.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
ed62babcffe24100449ddc08fe8ded4e0dbe704cf05504d0f541c244c9bc4f50 2061 libdfp_1.0.14-1.dsc
961f950d04575d141171e1f794f787e9f34ac9d81c0b2895f21c8cb7f7334c26 819588 libdfp_1.0.14.orig.tar.gz
56bb4ed2b47ffa811f74c9e03e0891b9ad5c9059c8f091d8f11e0008541c89b7 7424 libdfp_1.0.14-1.debian.tar.xz
f5640ce05c58ddb70f5c00358b3b54d967242dd47d064dc1a704ebe4e99f5736 6295 libdfp_1.0.14-1_ppc64el.buildinfo
Files:
4f6af96e956ae29f536b0fab17d20fb3 2061 libs optional libdfp_1.0.14-1.dsc
7fd913304902e346962b346a61672ebc 819588 libs optional libdfp_1.0.14.orig.tar.gz
9f6ab324b75bade9c55cfc27ebe231ca 7424 libs optional libdfp_1.0.14-1.debian.tar.xz
8aa80efef7e8460b7b2e41f6f6c98496 6295 libs optional libdfp_1.0.14-1_ppc64el.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=c1lw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: