Accepted asmail 2.1-5 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 06:16:16 +0200
Source: asmail
Binary: asmail asmail-dbgsym
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Fredrik Hallenberg <hallon@debian.org>
Changed-By: Fredrik Hallenberg <hallon@debian.org>
Description:
asmail - AfterStep mail monitor
Closes: 928322
Changes:
asmail (2.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix FTCBFS: Export a suitable CC for ./configure. (closes: #928322)
Patch from Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
Checksums-Sha1:
cd3a673b31a502364800b4424ff41334b22f6c70 1645 asmail_2.1-5.dsc
49077c6ca2b88dda738b2d862285e88dbe8395eb 3943 asmail_2.1-5.diff.gz
aac59348a8b0638dda8dcba692552f2e404c7faa 4660 asmail-dbgsym_2.1-5_amd64.deb
d186d6e8c069afdf412b22a90152872380769fd6 6376 asmail_2.1-5_amd64.buildinfo
1a650bf645fe80476b694d6d7dfef9475972699c 123332 asmail_2.1-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ce2ca9c5c1eb6f11bd2239de1ecb64bd8b874d52532b873accbfa2c7adee3dca 1645 asmail_2.1-5.dsc
a6ee627c02a5451ba8ffd56e74fe2f9f857781ff3c61ab70688aac8373975bab 3943 asmail_2.1-5.diff.gz
e5db383bbe5799ae63a10a5d67358583f77053618a92be5fc714756f4d1e0cf2 4660 asmail-dbgsym_2.1-5_amd64.deb
15f49550cd169a2bdfc5c4e9d8878a9b6aa79a19cecac502ffbefa4f0ba9edda 6376 asmail_2.1-5_amd64.buildinfo
602f6e3fe1a439814635400ec7aab2c54a8819007c96e62746bf4660ed5bc59c 123332 asmail_2.1-5_amd64.deb
Files:
aac871a50f5298bbfce47ef9370a7782 1645 mail optional asmail_2.1-5.dsc
2fd710d7c0080a6f39aa5c00a16dabe2 3943 mail optional asmail_2.1-5.diff.gz
00a793033b3a0cdc66315c6b232ccf3c 4660 debug optional asmail-dbgsym_2.1-5_amd64.deb
4632dd0f5d8bd42fdade479e0df461b4 6376 mail optional asmail_2.1-5_amd64.buildinfo
8d59135efb15b80b1cfe8d6538009ea6 123332 mail optional asmail_2.1-5_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=/OOi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: