[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted openjdk-11 11.0.3+4-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:57:00 +0100
Source: openjdk-11
Architecture: source
Version: 11.0.3+4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Changes:
 openjdk-11 (11.0.3+4-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * OpenJDK 11.0.3+4 build.
   * Fix the wrong assumption in the autopkg tests that the OpenJDK is
     the same as the default JDK.
   * Don't prune the build trees before running the tests.
Checksums-Sha1:
 a505aaf437b57c1a0129046f760d6bc6d52afd44 4669 openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1.dsc
 672e0b33ad25b816ea3c30ff9622979178a09710 75369748 openjdk-11_11.0.3+4.orig.tar.xz
 7c0a8ba9c5db364e0b363d312e77604253d2e2d6 167076 openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1.debian.tar.xz
 eeaa7e253b0bf65eaa0d2e840b94c94984e185c3 17312 openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 f1e449a0ca9b0ef4b89dea4f0123f16c5eb1825f891fc2d827fa985f9478ba5c 4669 openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1.dsc
 78d8bea27ed725f3d4b3fe1f92b6b38e373722672407c73f4b630115b57bb6a4 75369748 openjdk-11_11.0.3+4.orig.tar.xz
 827d7c5aaf880cb5c76e2f849096b3157cd5d5da47282f8486ea5a241605fe4d 167076 openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1.debian.tar.xz
 574f9ef6a21f97ef048cd359e6b0899f7ca11b63153d714093c72b4cb65abcc7 17312 openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 89880fff80194f12c1bdc03fbd982e40 4669 java optional openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1.dsc
 2515152c00931506babbf37ee786cf26 75369748 java optional openjdk-11_11.0.3+4.orig.tar.xz
 59d013ff9b5cc8063cfabdb86ea90e4e 167076 java optional openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1.debian.tar.xz
 99af22108936d07486a62667c970a40f 17312 java optional openjdk-11_11.0.3+4-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=+Gla
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: