Accepted sbcl 2:1.5.0-1 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:03:53 +0100
Source: sbcl
Architecture: source
Version: 2:1.5.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <debian-common-lisp@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>
Changes:
sbcl (2:1.5.0-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* Drop patches applied upstream
+ coerce-float.patch
+ deduplicate-initargs.patch
+ tree-equal-eql.patch
* Remove kfreebsd-i386 from the list of supported archs. Bootstrapping
efforts failed with a bus error (both with clisp and with old sbcl
binary)
Checksums-Sha1:
465dc1d5cf9b01d2a8a300abf6e08e87efc0bc8b 2320 sbcl_1.5.0-1.dsc
ea910caf81ba183be72382602d4800da6e695f17 6257355 sbcl_1.5.0.orig.tar.bz2
5c84f5b0c1bf1c4275c59d66cd14283954d73b7f 72696 sbcl_1.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
6d2ff8500d25bdb3b9a2179a18789eea2e5d0fbb 10119 sbcl_1.5.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
6e23cee98bee07b0d51d17466757e8b0cd94e4a917cda15f38e4b13fc511bd02 2320 sbcl_1.5.0-1.dsc
1ff98f17f6ba40c0d987efc907161f729cc9bd8516fe1f28e124626c16418ca8 6257355 sbcl_1.5.0.orig.tar.bz2
fa270fc2fa8178ad3fcc99b69648f33697f8c8e7f0f22ae71510f68ee75c1ac4 72696 sbcl_1.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
54c649f3c80f7ab0461999d428c27fed298f55e61824d3c3ab1333ace88d1615 10119 sbcl_1.5.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
0543f490082a9c1437f4073ae3631a83 2320 lisp optional sbcl_1.5.0-1.dsc
b0f8e2c428372556136413c8cfb4b68b 6257355 lisp optional sbcl_1.5.0.orig.tar.bz2
58c553017b96f5b9af87e618b5d9ca78 72696 lisp optional sbcl_1.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
d06d865c02e773d1b4c709a60abe4f88 10119 lisp optional sbcl_1.5.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=JH9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: