Accepted spampd 2.53-1 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:16:46 +0100
Source: spampd
Binary: spampd
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.53-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org>
Description:
spampd - spamassassin based SMTP/LMTP proxy daemon
Changes:
spampd (2.53-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 2.53
* Use the --setsid argument to make sure the process is correctly detached.
* Bumped Standards-Version, no changes needed.
Checksums-Sha1:
d08fdd971e7a79d902e5a71910d6a66c1f2f036d 1702 spampd_2.53-1.dsc
6fc92247dd66b9d147a610a1ffe060cb86cd3486 217945 spampd_2.53.orig.tar.gz
b3176b032e3c3fef4cae3afad7042b575a579252 13896 spampd_2.53-1.debian.tar.xz
d2430a656bc6136462d033fa8e953ef0783202b7 48508 spampd_2.53-1_all.deb
49a78b4f23c72b64ac01d919d84de502925f96bc 5322 spampd_2.53-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
af971b76ec08bb7949b292f1439c2e0e805461c0be854ea22198df96e99f9fa6 1702 spampd_2.53-1.dsc
58f37e61bac99a0423605c7db23cf8d1e4389681fe50d7e37ce2e31d46e27a88 217945 spampd_2.53.orig.tar.gz
85c0adc90bc56f55a2d06d5ba5601694058452b58a09ee5a9cd43326c96863c2 13896 spampd_2.53-1.debian.tar.xz
1cfcd0984936e1f528284b536973eada8daa96d9f3c3bd1d5de9ffca03f3447d 48508 spampd_2.53-1_all.deb
350ed31d7609b3d480d9b10a47713c7bbea065d273d3e0e4359990311e96746f 5322 spampd_2.53-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
7bd00c367f155ac1d4dc18ca5a19927a 1702 mail optional spampd_2.53-1.dsc
63ef45a103687ec3a1b7983f537b4d9a 217945 mail optional spampd_2.53.orig.tar.gz
c1bddef92b13904bb82e6d4038b5c4b0 13896 mail optional spampd_2.53-1.debian.tar.xz
89ed7ac7b8c538fd20027e455721ecc4 48508 mail optional spampd_2.53-1_all.deb
9db9074101ddfbc00a57fae836c5f154 5322 mail optional spampd_2.53-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=6iYl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: