[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted boxer-data 10.7.5 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:15:32 +0100
Source: boxer-data
Architecture: source
Version: 10.7.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Boxer developers <boxer-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Closes: 919581
Changes:
 boxer-data (10.7.5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix autopkgtest: Depends on boxer.
     Closes: Bug#919581. Thanks to Paul Gevers.
   * Update class Admin.harden:
     + Include package debian-security-support.
     + Include package hardening-runtime since Buster.
   * Update class Framework.rdf.redland:
     + Include package python3-librdf (not python-librdf)
       in subclass binding.python.
     + Include package python-rdflib-tools in subclass tools.
     + Add subclass binding.r since Buster.
     + Include package ontospy in subclass tools since Buster.
   * Update TODOs.
Checksums-Sha1:
 5b09ed3c82fef0b7f8b77f024d108bb52c0b1750 1688 boxer-data_10.7.5.dsc
 a6be810d358449042452111a2def9a1c99a8f53d 81004 boxer-data_10.7.5.tar.xz
 ae797084eff89240a090e06499d1824af0e1fc2e 7868 boxer-data_10.7.5_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 046dbd17c77f4b217c4b39d43274b2ebbc6eea123b66225ad1c3381493a40b89 1688 boxer-data_10.7.5.dsc
 8bc219fb2a6a0fc7fb1524734d4d2d3bd06b674c877bc55b8d70fce41c03455a 81004 boxer-data_10.7.5.tar.xz
 2cb9011fd495399e8a9e4c4199ba37ee68873da5674bc721c1eed76a99ca56fe 7868 boxer-data_10.7.5_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 b9a2120766e4373fa884096536b441cb 1688 misc optional boxer-data_10.7.5.dsc
 e4cebb57db6a0148d67fb8b7567f598e 81004 misc optional boxer-data_10.7.5.tar.xz
 293331af70e2d68faf76ed38757aafc8 7868 misc optional boxer-data_10.7.5_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=d83O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: