Accepted cewl 5.4.4.1-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 11:55:42 -0200
Source: cewl
Architecture: source
Version: 5.4.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Security Tools <team+pkg-security@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>
Changes:
cewl (5.4.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 5.4.4.1.
* Using new DH level format. Consequently:
- debian/compat: removed.
- debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
Build-Depends field and bumped level to 12.
* debian/control: bumped Standards-Version to 4.3.0.
* debian/copyright: updated upstream and packaging copyright years.
* debian/patches/20_fix-lib-location.patch: updated to be compliant with
new upstream version.
Checksums-Sha1:
d9ccb2c565ffc7201950c3c17ad67349b747a403 1947 cewl_5.4.4.1-1.dsc
906ba36878218f0d86ddc7cd1715300d949b3c17 14326 cewl_5.4.4.1.orig.tar.gz
5f1b7af302132b3c0bbd84b004eba381f3045070 10180 cewl_5.4.4.1-1.debian.tar.xz
8dcd477b7e74b228dc56ecad610da64af83f32ef 8175 cewl_5.4.4.1-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
5f1ff982e9d4bbae3bdf5fd7ebf99993b7d976cdf1d0c80cd6b5d9adced4ac6b 1947 cewl_5.4.4.1-1.dsc
ff46734580257be4fa0f2670d10f075d07a10b6b44e361c70dd968badffa4cc2 14326 cewl_5.4.4.1.orig.tar.gz
f77cd26c108cc260a61874273cb17d01bda0056153e79ba1eda1df510a7be3f2 10180 cewl_5.4.4.1-1.debian.tar.xz
3f198d5de1b806c066f1e6b929f9c22d9912b0bde567769f685e8e18e572dfce 8175 cewl_5.4.4.1-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
82212493044ce02d08f96db129c70279 1947 web optional cewl_5.4.4.1-1.dsc
4e9e47c6a6983c552af7060a64996eb5 14326 web optional cewl_5.4.4.1.orig.tar.gz
ce8a4d991ecedc8285eaff15b4340945 10180 web optional cewl_5.4.4.1-1.debian.tar.xz
28225c0e1eb76c010b3b981d749f83ec 8175 web optional cewl_5.4.4.1-1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=46dG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: