Accepted xss-lock 0.3.0-6 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 19:42:20 +0000
Source: xss-lock
Binary: xss-lock
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org>
Description:
xss-lock - invoke external screen lock in response to XScreenSaver events
Closes: 914544 914778
Changes:
xss-lock (0.3.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Apply patch from Teemu Ikonen to remove non-working xdg patch from
/usr/share/doc/xss-lock/ and update documentation (Closes: #914778).
* Apply several patches from https://github.com/tpikonen/xss-lock:
- Adding `--session` option to specify option to use (patch by Antoine
Damhet).
- Send SIGHUP to notifier if screensaver was disabled before starting
locker, continue to send SIGTERM to notifier when locker is engaged).
(patch by Teemu Ikonen).
- Skip running notifier if cycle time is 0 (patch by Teemu Ikonen)
(Closes: #914544).
Checksums-Sha1:
f7dd97907c91e4d891e2240badb0723fd3e9e77c 1931 xss-lock_0.3.0-6.dsc
d93353eb937a4eeb4b559dab74024f000f1d8425 11860 xss-lock_0.3.0-6.debian.tar.xz
0454f11c97fe94e3b6c7a3f8afa954d1d4b88294 6935 xss-lock_0.3.0-6_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
d1abb66cd84a7291eb310072c33ba71624a4f7ed18c83a6e20c7f41acd17f357 1931 xss-lock_0.3.0-6.dsc
360278da59191cc01b8b285f5d4130a1efcbd5f2cdabda849f87054807e188bd 11860 xss-lock_0.3.0-6.debian.tar.xz
516ba4cd34ee29980eb7f1c4d7e64202a911e5266538fe9d2bd633ea2310a391 6935 xss-lock_0.3.0-6_source.buildinfo
Files:
dd504d58755b81ca8d1ba564c5f74c49 1931 x11 optional xss-lock_0.3.0-6.dsc
b679f776f329a7182356a6f2dfc47d38 11860 x11 optional xss-lock_0.3.0-6.debian.tar.xz
19b4851ac5f24ecf6a3e39a7d0b27b11 6935 x11 optional xss-lock_0.3.0-6_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJDBAEBCAAtFiEE7fn8DiT6MgcCyDswKi4ln2laRsYFAlwVWTkPHGlqY0BkZWJp
YW4ub3JnAAoJECouJZ9pWkbGThQP/0RXAjN6zDnc6352Pm0cb8WZb2oP2P0E68Qo
T6a6ndziEHmazOifWslWsopopZdib7YNpz0bhq5G/PE9u9dHEC0i5WHkBYAZMQlk
lSado6LQrsT2hMbgM5EgDOK5D1kQn8Xwv4GBxcIKVThDf075V0LmbeVos1DPRlT6
D5LcSwlxoMBQ89D3M3n8wpYwTZfcmFxC+b0Kzj37iHmyVoWKqFYsp8XdYDS82nHd
AQC1vAE2govUzlvla9r4GqlokzAB90SRcy4O8zBM7eu/tFj9GWnIM5EvyaP8IYwM
UFDEKlnW61KcAmktnmqQXP+7R9Wv+JiSMccxgWCI0rawSqVszs9hwQoa24zdqNw9
7Wh4Lk73Ybsz256x7lcrwY5626XC5JOSacSiwD6+FgFQWI+dsSlyOnlK1gyHqO7t
+GbG+MQgtIOzQABBNR0Kn/Pgp9FLhK+97G28HaK2py6c78r8WijUSgAyMob5bw4N
LYWE1FPve273Qm9pjSrQQDCykzw+rigAr+ny8P+HACC7prHjIuFO0ZDYG/LG2pH2
vCI0XVRfhTgx4sOMcewEGFrlCcDloera0/vUtAL24xKul3lxMIFJ549QMnu9mJDG
Jn4NOU7bRh+q9RpgRhdHzaQIk2/aNDcrARXyfS0XPtBso46FNOk9oaZmLGWPBhww
HqZTtOnz
=Yhmh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: