Accepted haskell-should-not-typecheck 2.1.0-5 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:20:38 +0300
Source: haskell-should-not-typecheck
Binary: libghc-should-not-typecheck-dev libghc-should-not-typecheck-prof libghc-should-not-typecheck-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group <pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ilias Tsitsimpis <iliastsi@debian.org>
Description:
libghc-should-not-typecheck-dev -
libghc-should-not-typecheck-doc -
libghc-should-not-typecheck-prof -
Changes:
haskell-should-not-typecheck (2.1.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Clint Adams ]
* Set Rules-Requires-Root to no.
.
[ Ilias Tsitsimpis ]
* Bump debhelper compat level to 10
Checksums-Sha1:
8fcbb3bb1a984bd4e9af076b5d3e8b229f36edbf 2628 haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5.dsc
9a1325546df9b3ca4b858ec512987b962d47e14c 2592 haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5.debian.tar.xz
f3ee793e3f7d5c580200e286b03ff6a80d621751 5844 haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
cb35effd971cecda550a90c4d5606c5f80387838d9fa541d3327739fc6194988 2628 haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5.dsc
666402908aacb8745bdee7e28da29e00aa80167c9627d1a03249b4e6e0ae0130 2592 haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5.debian.tar.xz
e820b6686cc1d0fc8332e69ce136ffe5144835c4b491123c1088b48405c6fdf0 5844 haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5_source.buildinfo
Files:
39bb592ab23a54e0dd2923a51b5047a3 2628 haskell optional haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5.dsc
4715ea3578a3c1f6b0e8f95f2bc4a396 2592 haskell optional haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5.debian.tar.xz
228eb96a507bc83ec4726a29ed7ad33f 5844 haskell optional haskell-should-not-typecheck_2.1.0-5_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=9+1E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: