Accepted swauth 1.3.0-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 19:40:32 +0200
Source: swauth
Binary: swauth swauth-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack <team+openstack@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org>
Description:
swauth - alternative authentication system for Swift
swauth-doc - alternative authentication system for Swift - documentation
Changes:
swauth (1.3.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* d/rules: Use dh_missing --fail-missing
* d/control: Set Vcs-* to salsa.debian.org
* d/copyright: Use https in Format
* d/copyright: Bump my copyright year
* d/tests: Use AUTOPKGTEST_TMP instead of ADTTMP
* d/control: Change Maintainer from @lists.alioth.debian.org to
@tracker.debian.org
* Bump standards version to 4.2.1 (no changes)
* Bump debhelper compat level to 11
* Use Python 3 version of Sphinx for building docs
* Add upstream metadata
* Add overrides for insane long lines of webadmin
Checksums-Sha1:
678b99fee3ec2ed87be3ab7d7856262f0e6815c4 2308 swauth_1.3.0-2.dsc
2425e44a50205f66ce0f72792c203aeb12883460 10004 swauth_1.3.0-2.debian.tar.xz
2306b48ff2d1009bfa507fbb4ee1faf50b3cc249 11051 swauth_1.3.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
1627f42654d99320bec474e0a0e21abc3d1c31d1d985329d9dc29c4dce181016 2308 swauth_1.3.0-2.dsc
048f9bfbd9b679d6e88d28097dd6e85d667afd5e050d91fab7161e5399cba676 10004 swauth_1.3.0-2.debian.tar.xz
5d27e6771f312a67e0469c251c06e885d0bce5b7b60903eae8009f6d9824f636 11051 swauth_1.3.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
69ea90fd9a08dc84ae746129e4fc1a55 2308 net optional swauth_1.3.0-2.dsc
29fa6d82a0ad3263ce8a6c71e1008741 10004 net optional swauth_1.3.0-2.debian.tar.xz
312e2d6d8734f7bfe2f0a6c6ea104557 11051 net optional swauth_1.3.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=AcsJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: