Accepted gnunet 0.10.1-5.1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 10:42:50 +0300
Source: gnunet
Binary: gnunet gnunet-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 0.10.1-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Bertrand Marc <bmarc@debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Description:
gnunet - GNU's framework for secure peer-to-peer networking (meta)
gnunet-dev - GNU's framework for secure peer-to-peer networking (development)
Closes: 906075
Changes:
gnunet (0.10.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Build-depend on python, to make gnunet-qr usable again.
(Closes: #906075)
Checksums-Sha1:
57b800b71d6d78eff63be0c69280c3f1ac12ba65 2408 gnunet_0.10.1-5.1.dsc
d44eee7070eb70900f5494480437fcdbab506a4f 40672 gnunet_0.10.1-5.1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
a9ea3fa6103438db53c9a3d369975cc083c50a499d60074233a115588c301e5a 2408 gnunet_0.10.1-5.1.dsc
39a309e0e822ded09721c25b8b616dcb8bc49827aef65156a4bf6ddb58c4886c 40672 gnunet_0.10.1-5.1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
cd473c8e6cd1e98ce7275fc98e6cdbca 2408 net optional gnunet_0.10.1-5.1.dsc
ac9821bf6adf8dd19e40f79c6cf6235a 40672 net optional gnunet_0.10.1-5.1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=fDnp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: