Accepted bfs 1.2.2-2 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:16:24 +0800
Source: bfs
Binary: bfs
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
bfs - Breadth-first version of find(1)
Changes:
bfs (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Drop dropping the fstype tests; this should have been fixed upstream:
https://github.com/tavianator/bfs/commit/85caf29cfd2f40ef10ed76d425bb89a5f8f45a1a.
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.5
Checksums-Sha1:
8e6b1d073e49d2e21d9bab7603b25180c5b863f4 1782 bfs_1.2.2-2.dsc
2e6cdfc4026852859b80f1eddb5853f67ac37516 2860 bfs_1.2.2-2.debian.tar.xz
2c0c1d2fa4e86ddf85c4498664cc7c7bd289d184 116860 bfs-dbgsym_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
65002b4574bbbcb8ac4f70b49f3b8d66d69b0a18 5652 bfs_1.2.2-2_amd64.buildinfo
0007c3ce95b3521c75e149efe248e6b4c5d0bbab 53500 bfs_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
01ca01a5e8176a825cc118df6131f12c8eef6b8a2cda7ceb1458c3d82e18bc03 1782 bfs_1.2.2-2.dsc
bcb04788aa2e709686a7ef3db6d3ec6dfbce3a642d2826369da4fc7f52b380f1 2860 bfs_1.2.2-2.debian.tar.xz
86f4f56cf383ad9c0650043bc89fba9070cc830e3f950c6c51ca2ff7ef61781a 116860 bfs-dbgsym_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
be0b7c00c271af01f6d9088e64137e802b97927b73067669c7e225017979bf2d 5652 bfs_1.2.2-2_amd64.buildinfo
f335b67dfaee0ea8eb64709758fd85d63939f41cf142ca3cdab857a86a9fc434 53500 bfs_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
Files:
b298855b6bfec9c56886566e566e8349 1782 utils optional bfs_1.2.2-2.dsc
d5ae4dba7b1b782f50825b4948b11db9 2860 utils optional bfs_1.2.2-2.debian.tar.xz
01ed84d89e66ee690ac2fc914b49a752 116860 debug optional bfs-dbgsym_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
431cad7f2559d27da8125e260ed4becb 5652 utils optional bfs_1.2.2-2_amd64.buildinfo
66d1c8c2c3693dffe5a5c35a195327d5 53500 utils optional bfs_1.2.2-2_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=i9Ma
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: