Accepted flexc++ 2.07.02-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:53:17 +0200
Source: flexc++
Binary: flexc++
Architecture: source
Version: 2.07.02-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Frank B. Brokken <f.b.brokken@rug.nl>
Changed-By: Frank B. Brokken <f.b.brokken@rug.nl>
Description:
flexc++ - Flex-style scanner generator for C++
Changes:
flexc++ (2.07.02-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version
* Upstream fixed missing semicolon behind [[fallthrough]] attributes in
flexc++'s own but also in its generated code (cf. C++ standard 20, section
10.6.5)
* Upstream migration from Github to Gitlab
* Updated debian/control accordingly
* Added debian/watch
Checksums-Sha1:
9f3ba0070bbc830764b6f27786a87e62b33eec37 2009 flexc++_2.07.02-1.dsc
09a83fe79f8257cdae1c8b2c3055b0b8a5b8c507 4416500 flexc++_2.07.02.orig.tar.gz
2ba3823ed3180fc988b496af989eaab4b7b33273 6348 flexc++_2.07.02-1.debian.tar.xz
21fc4eaed6c1850de4a1474fe71f2763d7174509 6083 flexc++_2.07.02-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
b99ee93156d89fb0ca6030795070c32755e4b1ed9018d9b531424b413f66c717 2009 flexc++_2.07.02-1.dsc
b0795903af518d2e253af012762ec633315b2837cebfedb1d5cd22760eb3c542 4416500 flexc++_2.07.02.orig.tar.gz
86b8da92b9711e9e4f9f8a48702cac6985a6882b52f49f9bd4d282bd4161bcf7 6348 flexc++_2.07.02-1.debian.tar.xz
88405eaa35f5e66d96aed0c3d8ae5321e1fbebe33f890357638fbdc8f829f4f2 6083 flexc++_2.07.02-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
ec480999ae459d86f9edb38c4428f9c2 2009 devel optional flexc++_2.07.02-1.dsc
4e2b33dca4c2c31faac55fd1f9d23089 4416500 devel optional flexc++_2.07.02.orig.tar.gz
8a126d6d71d16a8307d5a3ce4104b291 6348 devel optional flexc++_2.07.02-1.debian.tar.xz
25dbc4e8398adde1f9c434a4005b80ea 6083 devel optional flexc++_2.07.02-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=DxWa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: