Accepted gitpkg 0.29 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 17:29:35 +1030
Source: gitpkg
Binary: gitpkg
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ron Lee <ron@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ron Lee <ron@debian.org>
Description:
gitpkg - tools for maintaining Debian packages with git
Closes: 820842 887963
Changes:
gitpkg (0.29) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix git-debcherry for a change in the behaviour of how git rev-parse
handles tag refs. Thanks to James McCoy for spotting it and the initial
patch to fix it. Closes: #887963
.
* Support passing arbitrary options to the orig compressor, and default to
passing -n (--no-name) to gzip, so that it doesn't add a timestamp, making
the compressed orig tarball more reproducible. Thanks to Antoine Beaupré
for noticing the current default behaviour, the idea of passing this option
to gzip to improve it, and testing that it worked. The actual fix here is
a bit different, because -n (meaning this) is specific to gzip, so now we
have support for setting per-compressor options too. Closes: #820842
Checksums-Sha1:
70b005002fd54db3d3c1fa5b3152d6c3ec68aa1e 1459 gitpkg_0.29.dsc
42eb4b4d148092bd36d986ac195be5fd9a84c8aa 42356 gitpkg_0.29.tar.gz
5260035b4a881cb4718d8f8050f04c63895389d4 43318 gitpkg_0.29_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
48578e9426805d548bef7587dad9eb32516c4b12eeaa5fc6f439b877468d4b97 1459 gitpkg_0.29.dsc
a40b74dbf342af2b524180132a911696bdf007726319b190d0bab9490ff94f8d 42356 gitpkg_0.29.tar.gz
bd1fe4c5ca8ab5aef79dceada79c78d6a6e7844d52b171ba6aed2d02618b3979 43318 gitpkg_0.29_all.deb
Files:
b58f6173cd613a1ad867ea281ced3191 1459 vcs optional gitpkg_0.29.dsc
de1fa70e760d69256423d8d2fcd917ff 42356 vcs optional gitpkg_0.29.tar.gz
f176f1775578e4b9fe162cc4b5792c08 43318 vcs optional gitpkg_0.29_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=qarM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: