Accepted juce 5.2.1~repack-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:42:03 +0100
Source: juce
Binary: juce-modules-source juce-tools libjuce-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 5.2.1~repack-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org>
Description:
juce-modules-source - Jules' Utility Class Extensions (module sources)
juce-tools - JUCE's project management tools
libjuce-doc - Jules' Utility Class Extensions (documentation)
Closes: 889969 890035 890036
Changes:
juce (5.2.1~repack-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fixed building of documentation (for real)
* Use upstream's Makefile rather than second-guessing how to do it
* Added B-D on Python3 and added patch to use Py3 to build docs
* Added B-D on graphviz (Closes: #890035)
* Dropped .tag files for (more) reproducible builds. (Closes: #890036)
Thanks to Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> for the last two
* Re-enabled LV2 support (Closes: #889969)
* Refreshed LV2 sources
Checksums-Sha1:
1600d0699f23ab97fe57776e585639a4686a0f26 2409 juce_5.2.1~repack-2.dsc
16683c697665b7b421f79bd8402bdf65a1801b50 56596 juce_5.2.1~repack-2.debian.tar.xz
5f767523351388349d0cb88d9005389a9adc4a5e 16284 juce_5.2.1~repack-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
b989fdc6a1d2f571bfa176838ca2936cb9e95e5dc415abc297934d82a6afceaf 2409 juce_5.2.1~repack-2.dsc
0067f1b8c30fd1c9e3425dc6dfe691c94918c81adaa877c41b4bea37b8664f53 56596 juce_5.2.1~repack-2.debian.tar.xz
97b8ba10fa88cd1fd634418ad5f79f52683a557b34213974a818a846bd34a8c2 16284 juce_5.2.1~repack-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
119008b5a3b2b988b60708a7dc6015a5 2409 devel optional juce_5.2.1~repack-2.dsc
86d86f02e3967066873215d021cc43af 56596 devel optional juce_5.2.1~repack-2.debian.tar.xz
a998ad792ca75556ccc37091cc5ea41d 16284 devel optional juce_5.2.1~repack-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=qgrw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: