Accepted xml2rfc 2.8.4-1 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 20:37:05 -0500
Source: xml2rfc
Binary: xml2rfc
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Changed-By: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Description:
xml2rfc - XML-based formatting tool for RFCs
Changes:
xml2rfc (2.8.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
- Drop debian/patches/0001-Add-missing-test.py-from-upstream.patch, fixed
upstream
Checksums-Sha1:
b40c4d0f5223daa05ebdb72919504006133af85f 1983 xml2rfc_2.8.4-1.dsc
03591fb42679d6f95a929df3f774a253f5857ec6 1728115 xml2rfc_2.8.4.orig.tar.gz
f49f9f5a9fa5f7e46a3476ad78e41dab47f94102 13544 xml2rfc_2.8.4-1.debian.tar.xz
e5a60b200c547be8c355ca5466314e1585e60f9e 105800 xml2rfc_2.8.4-1_all.deb
5623a1c9d7fa0be28949e4ba4d11124187126730 5676 xml2rfc_2.8.4-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
9ae44888589d421886c580bbbfb75508d4f7dd0c5cd5e86e356d9b8bc06ae6fc 1983 xml2rfc_2.8.4-1.dsc
e2fe8e73c5b3233f0418d6a7beb61b789195abbb58b35e16aa7c528ef46b19cc 1728115 xml2rfc_2.8.4.orig.tar.gz
abec7b67ccf97a38f599857660041d6995075cb10f587266152c612d4d6dbf02 13544 xml2rfc_2.8.4-1.debian.tar.xz
517557fb968fce108ed90789c731aa8a637d7727b8dd553d0177708252330b4a 105800 xml2rfc_2.8.4-1_all.deb
649b3fba85fdaaa9dfc9589c3f2e946a1c9b3ac7acde728baf53f569429437dd 5676 xml2rfc_2.8.4-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
3b07f524ab3385240fed3815c8f0b4b4 1983 non-free/text optional xml2rfc_2.8.4-1.dsc
84a71ed0a37decc60ba76b5375bfa4a1 1728115 non-free/text optional xml2rfc_2.8.4.orig.tar.gz
f5f974f62ded314b8bca563f022e6fa6 13544 non-free/text optional xml2rfc_2.8.4-1.debian.tar.xz
c579a02386a76f0c5e3a2a79ce9cd6c7 105800 non-free/text optional xml2rfc_2.8.4-1_all.deb
4bb6af1043ec3c7602940615b4722e7d 5676 non-free/text optional xml2rfc_2.8.4-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=5uyN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: