[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted swauth 1.2.0-4 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:24:54 +0100
Source: swauth
Binary: swauth swauth-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.2.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian OpenStack <openstack-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org>
Description:
 swauth     - alternative authentication system for Swift
 swauth-doc - alternative authentication system for Swift - documentation
Closes: 882314
Changes:
 swauth (1.2.0-4) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   [ Daniel Baumann ]
   * Updating vcs fields.
   * Updating copyright format url.
   * Updating maintainer field.
   * Running wrap-and-sort -bast.
   * Removing gbp.conf, not used anymore or should be specified in the
     developers dotfiles.
   * Updating standards version to 4.1.0.
 .
   [ Ondřej Nový ]
   * Hash token before storing it in Swift
     (CVE-2017-16613, Closes: #882314)
Checksums-Sha1:
 5ffcb4ebf43a7b81b4f8df65bfa7fe36a08dd762 2265 swauth_1.2.0-4.dsc
 4eb71cd1308609ad83c8c0ab9809c37049dc0bcf 11396 swauth_1.2.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 cd108fd1bd8add6f46fbb0a443419468d03796ba 10835 swauth_1.2.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b32ee396e72c2aec97c41a78111d1a54a18111b4943889c6703a16187509f99d 2265 swauth_1.2.0-4.dsc
 e7f24e88eaa31bcb0efedaa8b1d72c6a51a08bf9b216ccc42dc0b2c3132ba904 11396 swauth_1.2.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 5c9ece085ec03265b522d69eb45d7a14e21c9bd0a4367aeb468ca73f8da69b3e 10835 swauth_1.2.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 19ce798c784df0c51d070128eded93d3 2265 net optional swauth_1.2.0-4.dsc
 8afded608042f4c6bd433e065515ce29 11396 net optional swauth_1.2.0-4.debian.tar.xz
 9560391d6aef418132fd2ad4e0442240 10835 net optional swauth_1.2.0-4_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=VIcJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: