Accepted racket 6.10.1+dfsg1-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 18:19:53 -0300
Source: racket
Binary: racket racket-common racket-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 6.10.1+dfsg1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Changed-By: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Description:
racket - extensible programming language in the Scheme family
racket-common - extensible programming language in the Scheme family (shared file
racket-doc - extensible programming language in the Scheme family (documentati
Changes:
racket (6.10.1+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
* fix changelog for 6.9-1; wrong patch was discussed
* Assert compliance with policy 4.1.1; no changes.
* Bump debhelper compat level to 10
* non-free docs for srfi 5, 29, 32 removed
Checksums-Sha1:
e48cd14e41b6194f52e6bfe1dcc7ab080ab2c3e0 2073 racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1.dsc
8042c9f07d713adee854e78fa9b149d0ed492cd7 22218984 racket_6.10.1+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
216c54d7c4dbf6bba58ad82cef2cf411af17b8be 25076 racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
e3e7e8b7d4300dbd2635f5c9c1bd2d381a53ce42 11043 racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
2094d6ee763411bbffe07b39eb24d5f9feaf5897727e1a4c3e5cd4623ca72d16 2073 racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1.dsc
abaaef855737cf4d0f52c415addb784c2836feff230bc3aca239ec98fb834fa7 22218984 racket_6.10.1+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
182166b3d051ebff2cb974e074149c05172143faec9500c885fbd0b42274cc59 25076 racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
c36cc912e93478d89d6e5b7a48746c166e1746c270d67529339f85ac2cda14a7 11043 racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
9e038fa80dc0373af3739649b3ce1f03 2073 lisp optional racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1.dsc
b932c56f323b7f0242e1c09b9d593e10 22218984 lisp optional racket_6.10.1+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
574671a7ffd76649223004bddce47e0f 25076 lisp optional racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
aeb6c8d60b45c3fb6e6b2c93db851f2b 11043 lisp optional racket_6.10.1+dfsg1-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=xM4W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: