Accepted ostree 2017.9-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:43:30 +0100
Source: ostree
Binary: gir1.2-ostree-1.0 libostree-1-1 libostree-dev libostree-doc ostree ostree-tests
Architecture: source
Version: 2017.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Utopia Maintenance Team <pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Description:
gir1.2-ostree-1.0 - content-addressed filesystem for operating system binaries (intro
libostree-1-1 - content-addressed filesystem for operating system binaries (libra
libostree-dev - Development files for the ostree library
libostree-doc - Development documentation for the ostree library
ostree - content-addressed filesystem for operating system binaries
ostree-tests - content-addressed filesystem for operating system binaries - test
Changes:
ostree (2017.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
- Drop backported patch
- Update symbols file
* debian/rules: Adjust a comment to avoid Lintian thinking this is a
dh_make template
Checksums-Sha1:
851ddf82047a47be2b5a1bd639f7b1eba0b8f348 2990 ostree_2017.9-1.dsc
e79e98b6670b0bb42d50a88988f094be84588005 802780 ostree_2017.9.orig.tar.xz
961b20268ac8bc92d5c8cde9dcc6c3b5173cac52 15608 ostree_2017.9-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
f5719f4967c3a29748c8ebcf9d7d81d9a1bcb39350a892d1d45dc7a4160e510f 2990 ostree_2017.9-1.dsc
4a2f31b600f5f95436fe62e2adb0c5c79e44112caf88773c8a6defdeecce62e8 802780 ostree_2017.9.orig.tar.xz
5dced3a9adcc4fc99e7bf187b0b359e6565db8dc074e7ace1564c49b6d78f575 15608 ostree_2017.9-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
5fa54c06590d62fde9099a8f7f4a4d18 2990 admin optional ostree_2017.9-1.dsc
cdd608bc8c2d55faefb8b2d31ff6fd63 802780 admin optional ostree_2017.9.orig.tar.xz
67fa7f2d52a87c160244cffc4eb1a914 15608 admin optional ostree_2017.9-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=yK/X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: