Accepted bfs 1.0.2-5 (source amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 20:02:06 +0100
Source: bfs
Binary: bfs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
bfs - Breadth-first version of find(1)
Changes:
bfs (1.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Don't use the upstream "release" Makefile target as it overrides CFLAGS.
Thanks to Tavian Barnes.
* Install upstream's README.md as the upstream changelog.
Checksums-Sha1:
12deeab913b6c08bb8ed30c54af4264812bc86c3 1777 bfs_1.0.2-5.dsc
f3cc0cc05ca82445486f9814fb55c9328aee880d 2524 bfs_1.0.2-5.debian.tar.xz
9cfa4bd7a1ff3edd99452b361bce4c9a2734bfd6 99654 bfs-dbgsym_1.0.2-5_amd64.deb
b438266773f4f0a5ddb7202db83979d6f80be7ab 5444 bfs_1.0.2-5_amd64.buildinfo
d01c084957d7223c1b8c80b364dafce1f023d7db 41546 bfs_1.0.2-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
b510a607a27c906e194ff376e268b836dc2ec72291d3cbf8bda669c7799806cf 1777 bfs_1.0.2-5.dsc
a0a06fd3b507d24d03bed27adc835177751bd18b3d044de6239204d8696832fe 2524 bfs_1.0.2-5.debian.tar.xz
26bab2e1f9c9d7d00c308e1d52a1db78cfa2289f3f703ee0972d783c8d7b7924 99654 bfs-dbgsym_1.0.2-5_amd64.deb
ce03ad33a2599460abdb10e8e26c33c0fb7e0c37f798f8dd9c3b7691eaf2578e 5444 bfs_1.0.2-5_amd64.buildinfo
970b5e48f0c8e3d3e76c1a07ea5148ad2d0b0109dfbe44ba107141e193312046 41546 bfs_1.0.2-5_amd64.deb
Files:
b8f5033f5cbe04ecbf984ecd748baf96 1777 utils extra bfs_1.0.2-5.dsc
8f50f8f2b8a315c87232874ee94d176f 2524 utils extra bfs_1.0.2-5.debian.tar.xz
465fa78ed7761b98660ffa8d78736ed6 99654 debug extra bfs-dbgsym_1.0.2-5_amd64.deb
622670bf28303c916d9aef3ce6a26c31 5444 utils extra bfs_1.0.2-5_amd64.buildinfo
4c79b5a66c7df2096ff9b9b55f69da31 41546 utils extra bfs_1.0.2-5_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=0MSR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: