[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted pam-geoip 1.1-4 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:28:57 +0200
Source: pam-geoip
Binary: libpam-geoip
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Changed-By: Patrick Matthäi <pmatthaei@debian.org>
Description:
 libpam-geoip - PAM module checking access of source IPs with a GeoIP database
Changes:
 pam-geoip (1.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.0.0 (no changes required).
   * Adjust lintian overrides.
   * Do not build dbgsym packages. There are no debug symbols available.
Checksums-Sha1:
 3835a11e1b51f8f17dce03f3b90513875014d97a 1741 pam-geoip_1.1-4.dsc
 69a582e84008b076525a6f63e94ff6824c33cc3e 3060 pam-geoip_1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 5c9069e8b3238a75c1e2407f50758f95cca621e3 16334 libpam-geoip_1.1-4_amd64.deb
 6e99c2e13b5ca4239a1ccf7a15fef8965382eeb1 5842 pam-geoip_1.1-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c004cf55370ab33c0d5bd2831a9d4b245b52ca8a4d9d0c5c47cd38174981314a 1741 pam-geoip_1.1-4.dsc
 d9d591212e36382f596f04676c5c6c46f0c0e2fbcc64eb62888d095ed7e6dc41 3060 pam-geoip_1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 fee676121808b68105a7df0683547259ed791b94b6e6a03e93c4ee9b6347f53a 16334 libpam-geoip_1.1-4_amd64.deb
 fca7d3969d06dbbc6824fbfe933e9e9c6e5acc53e60a2f2caa7fc592e03a27d5 5842 pam-geoip_1.1-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 d08518d2b0786699c6771b9dd7196de5 1741 admin optional pam-geoip_1.1-4.dsc
 9255770f463d014dd5cef803bb38d7e1 3060 admin optional pam-geoip_1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
 60ff352866d85099f39d4f479a72dd75 16334 admin optional libpam-geoip_1.1-4_amd64.deb
 7a1e04d8b6780cb299e0a297677a20f8 5842 admin optional pam-geoip_1.1-4_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=fwKl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: