[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted krb5-auth-dialog 3.20.0-3 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 10:11:16 +0200
Source: krb5-auth-dialog
Binary: krb5-auth-dialog
Architecture: source
Version: 3.20.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Changed-By: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Description:
 krb5-auth-dialog - tray applet for reauthenticating kerberos tickets
Closes: 823568
Changes:
 krb5-auth-dialog (3.20.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * [5a7fe1c] Don't depend on unused libnm-glib-dev (Closes: #823568)
   * [1455a30] credentials_expiring_real: check if kcontext is valid
     (LP: #1700468)
   * [2593f51] Bump standards version to 4.0.0
   * [cc2b1c0] Bump standards version to 3.9.8
   * [083647b] Switch to debhelper 10
   * [f92d782] Use https vcs urls.
Checksums-Sha1:
 406db93d298d39c897a604cc2a2ed66393c8ed7a 2217 krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3.dsc
 1ef48d502686866bdd7bd3c9b256915798bc4114 6592 krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 adc8cf67509ae1bf03165795e523477a1d300bcb 14750 krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c297a00d1294e8a4f2b2ce8857a2d6468335f9f9816fd0ddca7b7470fae6e4d2 2217 krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3.dsc
 3dfe8cbdc8743f0a2d4f25700584ad1fa5c1ee56aaf76b88090c6ffe719fe5c9 6592 krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 821f26cc0dc99c433f4aaeba6a4bdf3136e647f0fef246c3c7b120a4e78bea83 14750 krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 66b367b9b9088a9e76503eb53279f73d 2217 gnome optional krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3.dsc
 ef5e1262a81a870b083d614995f7099e 6592 gnome optional krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3.debian.tar.xz
 2c4af5fa21db84c422b32a27e1855673 14750 gnome optional krb5-auth-dialog_3.20.0-3_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=AHh0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: