Accepted gajim-omemo 1.0.0-2 (source all) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 23:09:34 +0000
Source: gajim-omemo
Binary: gajim-omemo
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org>
Changed-By: W. Martin Borgert <debacle@debian.org>
Description:
gajim-omemo - Gajim plugin for OMEMO Multi-End Message and Object Encryption
Closes: 859894
Changes:
gajim-omemo (1.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add patch for XEP-0384 compliance. (Closes: #859894)
* Add patch for XEP-0380 compliance (correct EME element)
* Add patch to hide lock icon, when OMEMO encryption is disabled
* Add patch to not handle "normal" messages, prevents crash
Checksums-Sha1:
e9c7b04c7a5b3e56631ef4cf7a2aab181aa9dc88 1935 gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2.dsc
44ee4d369d6930fdf7c34db3cdf99d9be7756a39 7476 gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2.debian.tar.xz
9ebb3b7d277d50d89eb1c8f59697625fb25c1136 39966 gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2_all.deb
3bd1d80fb874ec6c5c6ffc8798b81c6f50f4c98d 5971 gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
4aef74cabca32ca09a4816a4c21655949ba5e95e5c0db63cdccd8e69506bb67b 1935 gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2.dsc
3703add626c3cd169fb2b48717c5033cd0bf26803504802ef1bbd2a58312649a 7476 gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2.debian.tar.xz
4d98939900a57a1aca43973a32b5f0f86e5ef8e554bebddcc42ab4a61d855f1c 39966 gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2_all.deb
ad6094872273520d201fe115010f7ce78e12361dce98749371f6ddf204426ba0 5971 gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
2c96074d57610f8c01255c0825007e9c 1935 net optional gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2.dsc
5b7969db640481393aae59912d0be21d 7476 net optional gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2.debian.tar.xz
7d8bf212c333224d4409a93ced7e260e 39966 net optional gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2_all.deb
4d7f22395478bda51df773e232da2c8d 5971 net optional gajim-omemo_1.0.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEftHeo0XZoKEY1KdA4+Chwoa5Y+oFAljqe/0ACgkQ4+Chwoa5
Y+rlsw//VY/YKAX4PP4L28W5l5mh08rNjmERblJBWZsrAWAPqq175e69S15xCpLt
jTuqX1RdeMbnowSHFvEXa+cSY93sJsZWQUA4mfn/oFP0GBnWENaHhHWaAkxdWRSK
+ILX82AgQZBNf6j78RE6ARPXi4QkkLs9aHDdyMuWv8wGyFRgPmZW2gHGv9N60b4V
+mDu+TVOspebmMlXEWeIH3Zq6nb+teax+vUax58QSgtqO4cPB14Xreuen9jCMZj9
j3Kn5kEsuYleNxwu0+wXZRC5QlD2hV2VbScxhNZqyD2rfBwrnL5lGWVxyPgqtZ3G
WBfM39nHG1EJBAzJY5RJ77RHHNGMHRL21piwfj7EBTK9V5hmIoAYWLjMulUQhvrQ
JN9SX4lCRVD1m/6andTeiRP37bexspxjLyJ3nnKzJQwh0ZlQKQElabqyshaGaJLj
iAnb5JceUkpLbfvIRoQxYQ0x2dy3baa4XlOOTtarLSsSGZIF8Dfvy13U0Q7by4Fm
Nbw4lQC35xvDklnZR/1pcnBRgUknLQpJdO+1mR7Ly27Dlc5hB8/idXGiynZU+C7U
tVW76qbUcYC7fxEXmB6+gVHPfgmlOCbT6Vfc3luW18lwJoApeBt9mcAmxtb9MBBm
QXOvqBvLPiVWgGaqNPdVF5CNEDYwvaVeYpwebNt+vfqk0NFmzUo=
=5k65
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: