Accepted dsniff 2.4b1+debian-24 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 18:34:19 +0100
Source: dsniff
Binary: dsniff
Architecture: source
Version: 2.4b1+debian-24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Security Tools Packaging Team <pkg-security-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Marcos Fouces <mfouces@yahoo.es>
Description:
dsniff - Various tools to sniff network traffic for cleartext insecurities
Closes: 715646 716355 716457 716458 852360 855869
Changes:
dsniff (2.4b1+debian-24) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix FTCBFS: Pass triplet-prefixed CC to configure.
Thanks to Helmut Grohne (Closes: #852360).
* Add four patches from Fedora:
(Closes: #715646, #716355, #716457, #716458)
+ 29_libnet_name2addr4.patch
+ 30_pntohl_shift.patch
+ 31_sysconf_clocks.patch
+ 32_rpc_segfault.patch (Closes: #855869)
* Polish, reorder and refresh patches.
* Add 33_sshcrypto_DES.patch
* Improve dep3 description in 33_sshcrypto_DES.patch
(as request by Stretch release team)
Checksums-Sha1:
3abeb4b6125953ae2f6b3e3f8f8a2235a87cf195 2058 dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24.dsc
61b38a3d87ab34564364a494b77486e4cb4f64b8 27700 dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24.debian.tar.xz
cc8cd42b8a2ee60c77d82b6940a1463ec5f4aecb 5985 dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
d9979d9ca8092a7595454a1056f715291ef48e632aa74aa037a7b5b92a45317c 2058 dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24.dsc
ee34e80fa8cafffa29310273fa21afdea3a58af8a98544bda14473b9f4af97af 27700 dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24.debian.tar.xz
d698c731168b44c649e770788e11ae094591ca331b431049e4a93a5f75c60b9e 5985 dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24_source.buildinfo
Files:
c2bc4cd858ad4eda6d860fd0855d9ce4 2058 net optional dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24.dsc
064f9c3f46be033110f74613ed748300 27700 net optional dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24.debian.tar.xz
76793281780fb37c03b64de1e6afd6ed 5985 net optional dsniff_2.4b1+debian-24_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=0fWu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: