Accepted newlisp 10.7.0-4 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:59:36 -0500
Source: newlisp
Binary: newlisp
Architecture: source
Version: 10.7.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
Changed-By: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net>
Description:
newlisp - LISP like, general purpose scripting language
Closes: 852259
Changes:
newlisp (10.7.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix shared library loading for modules.
Upstream uses a system for dlopen'ing shared libraries that is not
very robust. They depend on libraries being installed on full paths,
which can break things when you move from one system to another.
Because of this, a fix had to be implemented downstream in order to
use dlopen's functionality of automatically searching the system
libraries when you pass just the file name to it. This also has the
benefit of not trying to load libraries from /usr/local, which can be
dangerous. (Closes: #852259)
Checksums-Sha1:
6b1a8398fa0c1b4f52cb5614a6d4be89e9e75f58 1906 newlisp_10.7.0-4.dsc
296919b6ca52dc3b8d5cffa8a8e0e0d7b3f50b16 20456 newlisp_10.7.0-4.debian.tar.xz
50db125bba3c3feefd6f682b4fe566231104bef9 4800 newlisp_10.7.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
4e49f22ed57d82be0eac485af0c389e29aefbefcce0488efeaac23c7678804f6 1906 newlisp_10.7.0-4.dsc
f94f60427404640b5560ce010e17ef0bc143ff136f2df6ae77effda248d9c3a2 20456 newlisp_10.7.0-4.debian.tar.xz
9657d86cb2cf24352bce027f4de7c7ca02ac8cf195dd4d79c47f5cf16528ac17 4800 newlisp_10.7.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
604ef6c31615a1bc5f34dedabf9fe445 1906 lisp optional newlisp_10.7.0-4.dsc
efd05cbe0ecf16d3ff9d373ef2b473bf 20456 lisp optional newlisp_10.7.0-4.debian.tar.xz
ae420e15015214ab0a7ea4df540331fa 4800 lisp optional newlisp_10.7.0-4_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=SEAz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: