Accepted build-essential 12.3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:23:36 +0100
Source: build-essential
Binary: build-essential crossbuild-essential-arm64 crossbuild-essential-armel crossbuild-essential-armhf crossbuild-essential-mipsel crossbuild-essential-powerpc crossbuild-essential-ppc64el
Architecture: source
Version: 12.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Description:
build-essential - Informational list of build-essential packages
crossbuild-essential-arm64 - Informational list of cross-build-essential packages
crossbuild-essential-armel - Informational list of cross-build-essential packages
crossbuild-essential-armhf - Informational list of cross-build-essential packages
crossbuild-essential-mipsel - Informational list of cross-build-essential packages
crossbuild-essential-powerpc - Informational list of cross-build-essential packages
crossbuild-essential-ppc64el - Informational list of cross-build-essential packages
Changes:
build-essential (12.3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Bump debhelper and standards versions.
* Bump dependencies on gcc and g++ to 6.3.
Checksums-Sha1:
ff550a32875dd1500fa1a370418eca202bd6c80e 2006 build-essential_12.3.dsc
8c963c42d1fe95a43637c8f7d3bfd9b7ac95acb2 65664 build-essential_12.3.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
adca29326774aed32258df68bbbe757485f38d50e4a47ea39542ff4540a1cf47 2006 build-essential_12.3.dsc
baab0f0cadb984ad49958f74504b175fbc665f8f69aaa102c35c7e9b0fdf92d5 65664 build-essential_12.3.tar.gz
Files:
485d8d2810d71686d9dafeda7c2d98db 2006 devel optional build-essential_12.3.dsc
5afbbe46d5aad60f8181c7cf92b3440f 65664 devel optional build-essential_12.3.tar.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=XwF1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: