[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted openjdk-9 9~b153-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:52:52 +0100
Source: openjdk-9
Binary: openjdk-9-jdk-headless openjdk-9-jre-headless openjdk-9-jdk openjdk-9-jre openjdk-9-demo openjdk-9-source openjdk-9-doc openjdk-9-dbg openjdk-9-jre-zero
Architecture: source
Version: 9~b153-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk@lists.launchpad.net>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Description:
 openjdk-9-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols)
 openjdk-9-demo - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (demos and examples)
 openjdk-9-doc - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK) documentation
 openjdk-9-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK)
 openjdk-9-jdk-headless - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK) (headless)
 openjdk-9-jre - OpenJDK Java runtime, using ${vm:Name}
 openjdk-9-jre-headless - OpenJDK Java runtime, using ${vm:Name} (headless)
 openjdk-9-jre-zero - Alternative JVM for OpenJDK, using Zero/Shark
 openjdk-9-source - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK) source files
Changes:
 openjdk-9 (9~b153-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Lower cpu requirements for Debian/s390x.
Checksums-Sha1:
 c3ccc7b3d967d20d3f4cf066dab71d05be699df7 4462 openjdk-9_9~b153-2.dsc
 645234c97fd6aca0712d6c1edffc196a0391284e 187484 openjdk-9_9~b153-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 e27e43e7227101c476e0d0625931e4ac3089689599f407ceea0eb72c72c1d50d 4462 openjdk-9_9~b153-2.dsc
 e979937d43b1fa981ce0e9371150f59af1254b7ea1b15f561bd3ad91352f5310 187484 openjdk-9_9~b153-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 4ce9ebe42a81d01256e0ab2179b7ea49 4462 java optional openjdk-9_9~b153-2.dsc
 c8ec5cbf79d6d569e3b516abc2d8e196 187484 java optional openjdk-9_9~b153-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJEBAEBCAAuFiEE1WVxuIqLuvFAv2PWvX6qYHePpvUFAliDyrMQHGRva29AdWJ1
bnR1LmNvbQAKCRC9fqpgd4+m9XC5EAC4YTHnQslJxjUoKjlOxro35Z4OAAkvcsgR
TNaq9RNBMSJ5YMFHNysDJp6iW6WaZyuqq2GQ+jIHJcAjn28BvtFZtKvZw80Ond0C
azYiu8gB1V1bHkCF3Bteu/naaJmlk7LCHZ1enLJN1pWfc+lDsoBT62Tu5EvEz7VX
o6F9OYOzSIMCjcBBeOnKybO1ZAsBddGIZUaZ53RbsfvaX/QAofLzU21QbZ7FtEv4
QglL2EzKCJskdonZ3OCNz6XoV8PIauuhAakF0vJ4o4+10H1DjoIye+ic7SLfH5Rr
arQTwb4oLeaNWwLH4r080D1jFEhC12gfRLWXCG7nZHYbC82487NbNb23aL2wYyoL
GH2TO5y2fOUv1sVhD4rs2aYe/Qske25IgOv67AGC0C4eYY05kX17RsMRFOs+LmDN
OvU7RVOXBcuMlNkCoBbzcnD86vPmPzt5262r/+GfUnx1GaiV1Qh3IctRUs1EDyhk
bWODqQzGTRS2kEKKMm4a3J7xC5HLy9kcRdVbtuKPYNbPvgc5ih8Yj5As8wvuliUN
ocqmrVLvWkO3xyhPztCNTTOAJPN1PXuYejk5J/xOgWE+niyL6AkkIqtHpISL31Vh
Mx8fp0qiB+A0MGfiHiv5tAgt8+CnxHkOp0J5h/Q7Jf+0PMTEOPiFvclAYCs7uPrO
fJM3d3blVg==
=J/l5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: