[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted groff 1.22.3-5 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 18:09:43 +0000
Source: groff
Binary: groff-base groff
Architecture: source
Version: 1.22.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description:
 groff      - GNU troff text-formatting system
 groff-base - GNU troff text-formatting system (base system components)
Changes:
 groff (1.22.3-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Drop obsolete build-dependency on xutils-dev.
   * Remove no-groff-x11 bootstrapping hack.  If anything like this is still
     needed, it should be reimplemented using build profiles, but since groff
     can be installed from a foreign architecture using multiarch I believe
     that this is now unnecessary.
   * Upgrade to debhelper v9, using dh-exec.
   * Build with large file support.
   * Remove long-obsolete maintainer script file migration code from 2001.
Checksums-Sha1:
 4bdce577ba55d366af4348a8a68fbfdf70ddd75b 2102 groff_1.22.3-5.dsc
 3b0f55e9e31b06e96fe6ba1c2aa19bcdb285c488 44264 groff_1.22.3-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 66caa0819901650a06975a8da31d6f30e533b8e0c2b85d9b3173fec76e02b7d2 2102 groff_1.22.3-5.dsc
 16fd74337d68ada8ab625b2f898da824d8f1b2ff21b249c293fde1ec562e8c42 44264 groff_1.22.3-5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 89fa27cb17e324efd768b70e2e074005 2102 text important groff_1.22.3-5.dsc
 d80dab19f2256daa3a45b200d501d6e5 44264 text important groff_1.22.3-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -- Debian developer
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=EDk/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: