[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted sopel 6.5.0-1 (source all) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:57:55 -0500
Source: sopel
Binary: sopel
Architecture: source all
Version: 6.5.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
Changed-By: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>
Description:
 sopel      - simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC utility bot
Changes:
 sopel (6.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * new upstream release
   * add missing lsb-base dependency for init.d script
Checksums-Sha1:
 d57ed65d9aa4f93603ecbad815596e4893717778 1902 sopel_6.5.0-1.dsc
 1ce132e3077cc2ec4ee3f889612e91a12ca9473a 133978 sopel_6.5.0.orig.tar.gz
 321d4276844da6e91f472814539e9359e664591b 7176 sopel_6.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 c04be841c1900c13101da5947cd474180808d42c 108010 sopel_6.5.0-1_all.deb
 cf2f4fbd1388f909a6a05dec9ddf5158f7c1a28d 4970 sopel_6.5.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 bdabcbb52e2adb1cdfc4e61a932e55d073b6c067fc65d255bc7d0d0b36359784 1902 sopel_6.5.0-1.dsc
 96a08dfbcb62c7b9ac0f6b894750e036c43e856205e84ba8379a346bead58beb 133978 sopel_6.5.0.orig.tar.gz
 839da19ac100d8fd5a9f0653fbe4714e06fda07247813a9b7037298180eaff62 7176 sopel_6.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 6defd2ab8d16483d3e60abd3f42af2c98738ffb32d4a95f5391c68917b8aed3c 108010 sopel_6.5.0-1_all.deb
 527bd00832f223f0187ba8cadc14e192fbf1cdf13089502e46b122959061a33e 4970 sopel_6.5.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 b756b03fcda80667edefb362ad14fd81 1902 net optional sopel_6.5.0-1.dsc
 c4cff3df542d43d40e5902548db18d56 133978 net optional sopel_6.5.0.orig.tar.gz
 494526d37e66a221e41564b6dbff6f19 7176 net optional sopel_6.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 5f9cea219dee594a072a8feb2c109cde 108010 net optional sopel_6.5.0-1_all.deb
 2a6a4e13b82c0aa3d51fd49cae68efa7 4970 net optional sopel_6.5.0-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=/jbO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: