[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted postal 0.75 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 23:00:46 +1100
Source: postal
Binary: postal
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.75
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Changed-By: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Description:
 postal     - SMTP benchmark - the mad postman.
Closes: 437782
Changes:
 postal (0.75) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix some compiler warnings.
   * Stop autoconf controlling stripping. Closes: #437782
Checksums-Sha1:
 c6127eedb16d31fda87797d36b2434d1b67ac81e 1391 postal_0.75.dsc
 cd5ce102e90c4b49b6a61eea710bd073fe68f012 105922 postal_0.75.tar.gz
 cc1adb9c6cdc48eab63c5bff6a9ac484e777818c 503444 postal-dbgsym_0.75_amd64.deb
 eb00ea5e28e14f49058243ac5b405d5f29d0a989 5240 postal_0.75_amd64.buildinfo
 6aceceee74defd0d7a252c4c29292d62b42838d8 56014 postal_0.75_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 4bd09871b85d3b8fe6c68835756f16ddc08bae8cab2a7b773c52d7236a252488 1391 postal_0.75.dsc
 9ee7badfc4d29f4584fe000ab4e6f9366560a7955acc53ff994e1f0b493dd855 105922 postal_0.75.tar.gz
 b22a46e168bf05b052e37436a6503389bb7782be6dc23e486065a928b8f0a1c9 503444 postal-dbgsym_0.75_amd64.deb
 6d4bda32a41947f6f6b1f74f956ac4c0138e846f24f7fdf04d0e00440ba57996 5240 postal_0.75_amd64.buildinfo
 dc7a8fd803d2983d025ec29b0aaee864d6b301857a94d6fbd5c6ec05b07b16c5 56014 postal_0.75_amd64.deb
Files:
 ef207a52d43b1fa526e183a7373417f3 1391 utils optional postal_0.75.dsc
 b9c8a66f92cc2bb4164a9fb0d317ef46 105922 utils optional postal_0.75.tar.gz
 60e9c622e2979ccae7931894ac12e16b 503444 debug extra postal-dbgsym_0.75_amd64.deb
 118d1483114e220957100435a241888c 5240 utils optional postal_0.75_amd64.buildinfo
 188fbde49b0b0de7d9eea888ea2b903e 56014 utils optional postal_0.75_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=MdJq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: