[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted x2vnc 1.7.2-6 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:15:08 +0200
Source: x2vnc
Binary: x2vnc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.7.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@debian.org>
Changed-By: Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@debian.org>
Description:
 x2vnc      - Link a VNC and an X display together, simulating a multiheaded di
Closes: 633085
Changes:
 x2vnc (1.7.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * ipv6.patch (new): Add IPv6 support (Closes: #633085).
   * Switch to debhelper compat level 9.
   * missing-headers.patch: Add missing includes and prototypes to avoid
     potential problems with implicit function declarations.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8.
Checksums-Sha1:
 36f6a8a4253e9df76912cdfb3d7b4578a96a4686 1736 x2vnc_1.7.2-6.dsc
 6a2929f481fc0f177328954b44344fc42c49f80f 8328 x2vnc_1.7.2-6.debian.tar.xz
 eba561cb7fc3f8b6298bc68c5a2c4e1226aa5e66 59892 x2vnc-dbgsym_1.7.2-6_amd64.deb
 189dba785f277a0c273557bb1b3ced5a51aeec95 33246 x2vnc_1.7.2-6_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 1383263b5b062adc72195365bcc6b4ff13c2d20ee3b8980203a99c6d65a25527 1736 x2vnc_1.7.2-6.dsc
 8d413a615eeeaeb7c1c2e0e7b7a7a7063034e0985c46b324e4b3c9c36c6fe062 8328 x2vnc_1.7.2-6.debian.tar.xz
 b71e44eef6ae668e1943a4f7d130b7341fdc34be9d9bdc701420815a545674be 59892 x2vnc-dbgsym_1.7.2-6_amd64.deb
 7be5fc6ff0c0ea77991a1d8844efc23265100970b694a9510bd0de83cebe2db9 33246 x2vnc_1.7.2-6_amd64.deb
Files:
 f50733d51a41f64348b35821ca7e98d1 1736 x11 optional x2vnc_1.7.2-6.dsc
 6ac63ac9e899eb6acd3c88061eba198b 8328 x11 optional x2vnc_1.7.2-6.debian.tar.xz
 40b487164534fd318940f7570833e052 59892 debug extra x2vnc-dbgsym_1.7.2-6_amd64.deb
 88dff72af191cb7b1b3a9ae35208cbbc 33246 x11 optional x2vnc_1.7.2-6_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=pJJ/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: