Accepted mbedtls 2.3.0-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:11:54 +0100
Source: mbedtls
Binary: libmbedtls-dev libmbedcrypto0 libmbedtls10 libmbedx509-0 libmbedtls-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: James Cowgill <jcowgill@debian.org>
Changed-By: James Cowgill <jcowgill@debian.org>
Description:
libmbedcrypto0 - lightweight crypto and SSL/TLS library - crypto library
libmbedtls-dev - lightweight crypto and SSL/TLS library - development files
libmbedtls-doc - lightweight crypto and SSL/TLS library - documentation
libmbedtls10 - lightweight crypto and SSL/TLS library - tls library
libmbedx509-0 - lightweight crypto and SSL/TLS library - x509 certificate library
Changes:
mbedtls (2.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version.
.
* debian/copyright:
- Update dates and my email address.
* debian/patches:
- Refresh 01_config.patch.
- Drop 02_x32.patch -- applied upstream.
- Add 02_ssl_time_t.patch. Fixes compile error when including
mbedtls/ssl.h.
Checksums-Sha1:
ccb7f0bda9eb35b4cfe125c900ec7f8cc8a93ff7 2133 mbedtls_2.3.0-1.dsc
85fa4e61849646561a4d1f584fac3bf811db6066 1896335 mbedtls_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz
a7dbc5828e526bb13d7ad4a6134a0e87e8e48f38 10576 mbedtls_2.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
c83a7bfa4dde1cc86477365f39e6e709b2396f2749cd499c7dc97c132dd06718 2133 mbedtls_2.3.0-1.dsc
590734c8bc8b3ac48e9123d44bf03562e91f8dce0d1ac2615c318c077f3215b2 1896335 mbedtls_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz
ce5c033f0082a51f621aa6b4e114b1eec9756f5ada34183d81820be3cb412236 10576 mbedtls_2.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
ec06e51b27d98b98dd983a983adea600 2133 libs optional mbedtls_2.3.0-1.dsc
4dab982481441ed0a0235bc06d40eb17 1896335 libs optional mbedtls_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz
714b3f94c7f10cfac789e7998dfe481f 10576 libs optional mbedtls_2.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=on2L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: