[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ubuntu-core-launcher 1.0.29+2 (source amd64) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:11:07 +0000
Source: ubuntu-core-launcher
Binary: ubuntu-core-launcher
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.29+2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Changed-By: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Description:
 ubuntu-core-launcher - Launcher for ubuntu-core (snappy) apps
Changes:
 ubuntu-core-launcher (1.0.29+2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Zygmunt Krynicki ]
   * Rename the package and everything else from ubuntu-core-launcher to
     snap-run
   * Allow for graceful migrations from ubuntu-core-launcher to snap-run by
     providing both commands as binary packages, with proper dependencies and
     post-installation scripts that manage apparmor profile changes.
   * Discard the useless duplicate argument. Now snap-run is invoked with
     'snap-name $SECURITY_TAG $COMMAND...'. Previously, security tag was
     duplicated. In the future this will change once again, so that security
     tag is derived from an argument containing $SNAP_NAME and $APP_NAME.
   * Clean up tests so that shellcheck reports no more errors or warnings
   * Ensure that shellcheck reports no errors on each build
   * Add #DEBHELPER# to maintainer scripts (thanks to lintian)
   * Switch to autotools, build-depend on pkg-config, autotools-dev, autoconf
     and automake (thanks to ogra for the missing bits).
   * Use "dh $@ --with autoreconf" to prepare the build system.
   * Rename executable to snap-confine, to fit the new execution model.
 .
   [ Steve Langasek ]
   * Update Standards-Version.
   * Add lintian override for suid binary.
 .
   [ Zygmunt Krynicki ]
   * Change unreleased version back to 1.0.x after discussion with Michael Vogt.
   * Don't mark ubuntu-core-launcher as transitional (it isn't yet).
   * Move rm_conffile to ubuntu-core-launcher.maintscript, remove the now-empty
     postrm and preinst scripts.
   * Enable hardening options for snap-confine
   * Build-depend on udev, use udevlibdir instead of hardcoding /lib/udev
 .
   [ Steve Langasek ]
   * Don't call --enable-rootfs-is-core-snap on Debian.
   * Build with --disable-confinement for Debian, since Debian apparmor
     support doesn't meet snap requirements.
   * Revert package rename temporarily, to avoid a NEW roundtrip in Debian.
   * Don't ignore errors from maintainer script.
Checksums-Sha1:
 93786ca2465822883641b55e8868883411d19402 1679 ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2.dsc
 9aa0f49dd16ac0c5308934dcae61ccee1b35d904 36068 ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2.tar.xz
 b59a652d307d96bf09cfe75d06eff38ad4ee469c 11200 ubuntu-core-launcher-dbgsym_1.0.29+2_amd64.deb
 19237d3b3ed4d563646dc1de41ba24f9ce7ac5a6 13598 ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 cbca0bbed0532d19f016ff9dc710ecc6602c4e86d6cea99e51889483f9410a15 1679 ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2.dsc
 9c18c3973656033a3f29b0a8dd9c896ad5c34d94818618623e0ef61b072ed3b8 36068 ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2.tar.xz
 eb53539f05497d8ae5595fd71b273f94e6401b0be936d9fa6965ee82530f28a5 11200 ubuntu-core-launcher-dbgsym_1.0.29+2_amd64.deb
 7b5b580230f74ba35174d3f8242dd536f0d6848c5e27dfa313c2317827db8278 13598 ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2_amd64.deb
Files:
 6bc22f7434ee62dd2d978555e55925e1 1679 utils optional ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2.dsc
 198968f974fcf503596475ff16c78f21 36068 utils optional ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2.tar.xz
 1aa5199c451b6bb5c537cc374d86f150 11200 debug extra ubuntu-core-launcher-dbgsym_1.0.29+2_amd64.deb
 26adb436be26bb1764ef02b2d2ad350b 13598 utils optional ubuntu-core-launcher_1.0.29+2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Id/2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: