Accepted fweb 1.62-13 (source all amd64) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 16:44:43 +0200
Source: fweb
Binary: fweb fweb-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.62-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
Changed-By: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
Description:
fweb - literate-programming tool for C/C++/Fortran/Ratfor
fweb-doc - Documentation for literate-programming tool Fweb
Closes: 821829
Changes:
fweb (1.62-13) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Use dh_installtex and remove old postinst/postrm contents,
build-depend on tex-common (Closes: #821829).
* Fix homepage link.
* Fixed download URL in copyright file not to include (old) filename.
* Add a debian/watch file.
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.7, removed dependency on install-info.
Checksums-Sha1:
835dc6a35b339591b4cff1e951fabd78b01a5ce6 1746 fweb_1.62-13.dsc
6c89543a1cd66cae949789af17e16985bc09aa49 61068 fweb_1.62-13.debian.tar.xz
5cc6948cb7803ba2943cba2e8519a67cd8eecdfc 436436 fweb-doc_1.62-13_all.deb
7d5969e1177423a4bf398a05d15fdbcf35764167 242994 fweb_1.62-13_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
957fa431f3cd9c9a061a29595919c3f97ec38bf5dda52375f7cf62901a280372 1746 fweb_1.62-13.dsc
dc637488968f4d38c77985d0bad1447cc4f059e28afc7e820382c97a343d9f0f 61068 fweb_1.62-13.debian.tar.xz
b36ad70005dffa4e4fa60dd9e3ac428248045d132a07d8ab05173faaeb1a6ffd 436436 fweb-doc_1.62-13_all.deb
9bd07a1c0c311010507cf73cad72c5634d0ea90c0eaf752baaecedc007b6fe90 242994 fweb_1.62-13_amd64.deb
Files:
df53f29c12f2f3b5a6f053b601a5562b 1746 devel optional fweb_1.62-13.dsc
ed2f2d80ce24eb4b96f055cec61a9a34 61068 devel optional fweb_1.62-13.debian.tar.xz
ab15c0939d8dce1ad5afaffe2054945d 436436 doc optional fweb-doc_1.62-13_all.deb
453dee71811130a675526859d77929ef 242994 devel optional fweb_1.62-13_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=x4cJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: