Accepted mbuffer 20160228-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:30:37 +0300
Source: mbuffer
Binary: mbuffer
Architecture: source
Version: 20160228-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Changed-By: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Description:
mbuffer - tool for buffering data streams
Changes:
mbuffer (20160228-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Declare compliance with Debian Policy 3.9.8 with no changes.
* Add three more typo fixes to the 11-typos patch.
* Update the watch file to vesion 4 and explicitly add pgpmode=none.
* Add an autopkgtest suite.
* Bump the year on my debian/* copyright notice.
* New upstream release:
- refresh the patches
- update the upstream copyright years
* Bump the debhelper compat level to 10:
- let it handle the config.guess/config.sub update
- let it run autoreconf and the parallel build by itself
- add a Lintian override for the debhelper warning as it itself suggests
Checksums-Sha1:
8150967744e8da66c831fe828e4f820e1bb50e55 1868 mbuffer_20160228-1.dsc
1de0dc183a760262859a68f92f8bcc1defd3c34f 123108 mbuffer_20160228.orig.tar.gz
ed0ba7484e616f6ab0d49716c9a807b1df5a8792 8180 mbuffer_20160228-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
edbc9f2a4b701c5ffe113ffc28f28fc14c5579f8ae361ba2495cfac11e8a0139 1868 mbuffer_20160228-1.dsc
f7769f729e9b26a22a5d91922a740a0d1df6004dbe2b7a1febb0d7e4c3ef9e62 123108 mbuffer_20160228.orig.tar.gz
05a5e8223e30127fcd1b60de9bd3a1182fea92fec9c1aac72462a12989863073 8180 mbuffer_20160228-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
1bf4d88c5f84ae10586996b2da4a317f 1868 utils optional mbuffer_20160228-1.dsc
c11581803a07828f1f57e6fa35cb38d2 123108 utils optional mbuffer_20160228.orig.tar.gz
7d4176752d7c5ef352b59e42e2787a8a 8180 utils optional mbuffer_20160228-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=eAro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: