[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gnome-color-manager 3.20.0-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:06:49 +0200
Source: gnome-color-manager
Binary: gnome-color-manager
Architecture: source
Version: 3.20.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers <pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>
Description:
 gnome-color-manager - Color management integration for the GNOME desktop environment
Changes:
 gnome-color-manager (3.20.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Bump Build-Depends on libcolord-dev and Depends on colord to (>= 1.3.1) as
     per configure.ac.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8.
Checksums-Sha1:
 18a7cf765b06d2bb1d282b0181b27f785d01c3cb 2419 gnome-color-manager_3.20.0-1.dsc
 32a6c0896d7248db0fbdb0eb8f4bb9d08484c08b 2661180 gnome-color-manager_3.20.0.orig.tar.xz
 46770942bd9d9d4e0bbb84e9daa51e19eb70dfe9 3880 gnome-color-manager_3.20.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 dd03bd1c473163afb1ae45a74d5d70422183909fdbdf3ce195236aac314035d1 2419 gnome-color-manager_3.20.0-1.dsc
 fc4b8b075e79c1633ad935fb42e2aa06bf31a3e7e15360c705c771366e540793 2661180 gnome-color-manager_3.20.0.orig.tar.xz
 fe6d5e953f1f30f990bb11f4145dc14b2c1ce19a1262899d645710dda960db3e 3880 gnome-color-manager_3.20.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 67e8fc5a14e063665f7b93400353c97a 2419 gnome optional gnome-color-manager_3.20.0-1.dsc
 e9900077c337b6cb9879ef21bbf29a1f 2661180 gnome optional gnome-color-manager_3.20.0.orig.tar.xz
 3e457afe4f8fda3fa4cf74834110c5d1 3880 gnome optional gnome-color-manager_3.20.0-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=liVX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: