[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gnome-characters 3.20.1-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 15:14:57 +0200
Source: gnome-characters
Binary: gnome-characters
Architecture: source
Version: 3.20.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers <pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>
Description:
 gnome-characters - character map application
Closes: 819975
Changes:
 gnome-characters (3.20.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Drop uploaders.mk from debian/rules as this breaks the clean target with
     dh. Instead use the gnome dh addon which updates debian/control via
     dh_gnome_clean.
   * Bump minimum required version of gtk3 to 3.20.0, otherwise the application
     fails to start. (Closes: #819975)
Checksums-Sha1:
 00254ac696ffbe0e1d3f56d5df72335e10530a4a 2310 gnome-characters_3.20.1-1.dsc
 adb5c912cf02a280f63b01530151cd49efa0b8c4 1391224 gnome-characters_3.20.1.orig.tar.xz
 f33fec31a894a1f4bf98c11e36e97550fd5fc829 2964 gnome-characters_3.20.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 7b3b0392c0e1e600bb2fd51b5c02c1e10878fb7be8b4fccee03c93cc64e097de 2310 gnome-characters_3.20.1-1.dsc
 6891eed27a5b023200992540266a9216d081eef890d6d0836380dc3c0033857c 1391224 gnome-characters_3.20.1.orig.tar.xz
 ffb0aeb5ee28cae97b97cb4005e61bdba608a7ba943f206e050c253c025c9346 2964 gnome-characters_3.20.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 c5780d0ca56869b2a021092d59885ca7 2310 gnome optional gnome-characters_3.20.1-1.dsc
 5e1ce3cd54bede98aa0ee9cb9dd7934c 1391224 gnome optional gnome-characters_3.20.1.orig.tar.xz
 bfad8d70494240a8e087c854da3c9af8 2964 gnome optional gnome-characters_3.20.1-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXE4xwAAoJEGrh3w1gjyLcwcMP/jUnpDhlp9KWLkKMyMCP3rYG
luTSsyAmEdTmjCetQLUYx8amn2TsL+y8ofWtbGCO3CuCXM9oBUcTN02lqGx0kJho
qtdmbV2tikukx0GENAfk54kehO0KlHdTOw1VfPdTYC1TNVVToywCw1FIrvgfvMrR
Nw4Cn0Z4CzfVq1ka2ys5bqGS9JQdLFTS3cLsG+QxgM1AKp7+nUVyDEakKzuDx68L
0jiurZVbiJ7yKKzOBkoeJ8oM/2Jj7YkribPmRYOuA37RXQeu0EDazFLbEzTnvWXj
mZyjRMWcPtsZl2UNR3OcIvNbpWeEJwXMHvy3XJMgF9aNcQ3rcjhyXeX4dE2kU0Ly
gnva/j9dCbWIrSc9w8Hz0IVJOQDhcl/xv4QjH/0BWPah6nNsOyn2jsxiMSIGfiRw
eMV88bN2JhJ+oT7fjGPoOEB9dRN7zxduEZqj4e1kAXa2/1+7q0F81WT6bbaOeS+5
bvDIcEK3MGFw+7HQIwmrBHzuiz/CRPf0P5b9RCBWLvPSfBgCnVex4q1PSf/fLxTs
H6rboggdSSuiCCFY9PtRK0Ht5EhUMGtYNIybKE7vxh1Jxvea3udWkywNha2cyySd
zQPOZcVpgwsq8kMfRrGHjDXRuQM/pwVzqpgSPseyarw6XJexALdSSQ7me26XqeDc
Vzh64RUY7dzoPQcMVfQe
=L69M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: