Accepted debci 1.1.2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:23:17 -0300
Source: debci
Binary: debci debci-worker debci-collector
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Changed-By: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Description:
debci - continuous integration system for Debian
debci-collector - continuous integration system for Debian (collector daemon)
debci-worker - continuous integration system for Debian (worker daemon)
Changes:
debci (1.1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/tests/control: restrict backend-schroot to only running on VMs
(i.e. not on containers)
* debian/debci-worker@.service: make sure there is no maximum number of
processes; otherwise when using the lxc backend, we might get random
failures saying `Cannot fork: resource temporarily unavailable` with
systemd from stretch onwards.
- added debian/tests/worker-max-processes as a test case
* Add new backend `null`, which just uses the `null` virtualization regime
in adt-run. This will be useful for running tests, but can also be used
for running tests with zero overhead on trusted packages.
* backends/fake: add support for executing an specific command instead of
producing a random result if $DEBCI_FAKE_COMMAND is set.
Checksums-Sha1:
3b75a678ade144338d64f74696bffd1188536438 1847 debci_1.1.2.dsc
ee652206db9ad1480d2c48056d3db28eea229a91 65040 debci_1.1.2.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
f681bb7e008394e5854a32f2d526da0ac3660fb0bb5cdc0bc6ec8ca961395b23 1847 debci_1.1.2.dsc
d6402717f5e5b60d19c49336b1c40e91d81343377ef9b72a1dbddb6aebb4f7c5 65040 debci_1.1.2.tar.xz
Files:
783b08d4b8f32145bdfe0cd7e87fd566 1847 devel optional debci_1.1.2.dsc
4f8ed3e7c4608fff69a443fd96942758 65040 devel optional debci_1.1.2.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=ZDG6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: