[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gnupg2 2.1.11-6+exp2 (source) into experimental



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 02:59:18 -0400
Source: gnupg2
Binary: gnupg-agent scdaemon gpgsm gnupg2 gpgv2 dirmngr gpgv-udeb gpgv-win32
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.11-6+exp2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GnuPG Maintainers <pkg-gnupg-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Description:
 dirmngr    - server for managing certificate revocation lists
 gnupg-agent - GNU privacy guard - cryptographic agent
 gnupg2     - GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement (new v2.x)
 gpgsm      - GNU privacy guard - S/MIME version
 gpgv-udeb  - minimal signature verification tool (udeb)
 gpgv-win32 - GNU privacy guard - signature verification tool (win32 build)
 gpgv2      - GNU privacy guard - signature verification tool (new v2.x)
 scdaemon   - GNU privacy guard - smart card support
Changes:
 gnupg2 (2.1.11-6+exp2) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * avoid build failures when building only arch-dependent or only
     arch-independent packages.
Checksums-Sha1:
 b301bed482763c6ec0a3023eca3c549c2d171c7e 3022 gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp2.dsc
 cd1cf1c22f27bd6afc24b5811c3d970794b35d68 33376 gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp2.debian.tar.bz2
Checksums-Sha256:
 c48fda634892f2b59a65b363a878323b526c63b70adbfd6e3692b66f300f9a1c 3022 gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp2.dsc
 89f72f5e588efd5b6695f2c5a3be063110a4a0edea4898f9b22c6fb5fd47782c 33376 gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp2.debian.tar.bz2
Files:
 fae71bbe1d8638fc8346887aed9c33a9 3022 utils optional gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp2.dsc
 2c5a3d9e5136331113a90681fee32e0c 33376 utils optional gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp2.debian.tar.bz2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=4sA/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: