[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted fotoxx 16.03.1-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:01:19 +0200
Source: fotoxx
Binary: fotoxx fotoxx-common
Architecture: source
Version: 16.03.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Santiago Torres Batan <santi73@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org>
Description:
 fotoxx     - easy-to-use digital photo editor
 fotoxx-common - easy-to-use digital photo editor - common files
Closes: 812720
Changes:
 fotoxx (16.03.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Santiago Torres Batan  ]
   * New Upstream release.
 .
   [ Maximiliano Curia ]
   * New upstream release (16.03.1).
   * Add new patch: 0002-fix-FTBFS-using-clang-instead-of-gcc.patch.
     Thanks to Arthur Marble for the report and the patch (Closes: #812720)
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.7, no changes needed.
   * debian/control: Update Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git fields
Checksums-Sha1:
 377521929593ced099e55a6ad1b0eec53766a416 1990 fotoxx_16.03.1-1.dsc
 b74a9cb8c3711bfe5fb098ab07d0398f8683081b 4964849 fotoxx_16.03.1.orig.tar.gz
 5a2d2a20a1f1daa19ff62f641244adabe31def1c 5068 fotoxx_16.03.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 0bdb98b2e0198867f64055d97dedc61ce26d56a3ce4811faafa561b5212bcea6 1990 fotoxx_16.03.1-1.dsc
 473c634127e917d8f5ae250fc319d2e1b01fe123fa049e09efb8b6211a39c0a2 4964849 fotoxx_16.03.1.orig.tar.gz
 f73d46bd9e39cf52a5e538fdd741278a8b0e7a997f80832422f0ab296baff354 5068 fotoxx_16.03.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 5e1f776a3d5ac2172f3a859e37b75686 1990 graphics extra fotoxx_16.03.1-1.dsc
 a7f2503a4b17855680e0b5b60def27ee 4964849 graphics extra fotoxx_16.03.1.orig.tar.gz
 468a9f92a421315b8efc5b802330142d 5068 graphics extra fotoxx_16.03.1-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=pT8h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: